Nội dung

Wang et al. BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2019) 19:242 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-1005-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The predictive value of PaO2/FIO2 and additional parameters for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an 8-year prospective observational single-center cohort study Yan Wang, He Yang, Lisong Qiao, Zheng Tan, Jin Jin, Jingjing Yang, Li Zhang, Bao Min Fang and Xiaomao Xu* Abstract Background: Rapid stratification and appropriate treatment on admission are critical to saving lives of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). None of the clinical prediction tools perform well when applied to all patients with acute PE. It may be important to integrate respiratory features into the 2014 European Society of Cardiology model. First, we aimed to assess the relationship between the arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FIO2) ratio and in-hospital mortality, determine the optimal cutoff value of PaO2/FIO2, and determine if this value, which is quick and easy to obtain on admission, is a predictor of in-hospital mortality in this population. Second, we aimed to evaluate the potential additional determinants including laboratory parameters that may affect the in-hospital mortality. We hypothesized that the PaO2/FiO2 ratio would be a clinical prediction tool for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute PE. Methods: A prospective single-center observational cohort study was conducted in Beijing Hospital from January 2010 to November 2017. Arterial blood gas analysis data captured on admission, clinical characteristics, risk factors, laboratory data, imaging findings, and in-hospital mortality were compared between survivors and non-survivors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for in-hospital mortality based on the PaO2/FiO2 value was determined, and the association between the parameters and in-hospital mortality was analyzed by using logistic regression analysis. Results: Body mass index, history of cancer, PaO2/FiO2 value, pulse rate, cardiac troponin I level, lactate dehydrogenase level, white blood cell count, D-dimer level, and risk stratification measurements differed between survivors and non-survivors. The optimal cutoff value of PaO2/FiO2 for predicting mortality was 265 (AUC = 0.765, P < 0.001). Only a PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 265 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.823–21.483, P = 0.004), history of cancer (95% CI 1.161–15.927, P = 0.029), and risk stratification (95% CI 1.047–16.957, P = 0.043) continued to be associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality of acute PE. Conclusion: A simple determination of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at <265 may provide important information on admission about patients’ in-hospital prognosis, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 265, history of cancer, and risk stratification are predictors of in-hospital mortality of acute PE. Keywords: Predictive value, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, Parameters, In-hospital mortality * Correspondence: xuxiaomao3361@bjhmoh.cn Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing 100730, People’s Republic of China © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Wang et al. BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2019) 19:242 Background Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) occurs frequently and may cause death or serious disability [1]. Most deaths in patients with shock occur within the first few hours after admission [2]; therefore, rapid stratification and appropriate treatment are critical to save patients’ lives. It has been a challenge to predict the outcome of patients with acute PE, and risk stratification of patients with acute PE may physicians identify patients who may benefit from additional surveillance or therapy [3, 4]. Unfortunately, none of the clinical prediction tools perform well when applied to all patients with acute PE. Of all the clinical prediction tools evaluated, the one proposed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) is the best at risk stratifying patients [5]. However, several studies have still shown that more than 50% of patients with acute PE are hemodynamically stable on admission but have a high risk of death according to clinical models [6–8]. Additionally, another research study that assessed the ability of the 2014 ESC model to predict 30-day death after acute PE showed that stratification of patients at intermediate risk requires further improvement [9]. As more studies support the hypothesis of PE severity as a clinical continuum, it is important to find more scores, parameters, or biomarkers that would enable more accurate risk stratification in patients with acute PE [10]. Hypoxemia is common in acute PE and a very important mechanism in the pathogenesis of PE that leads to an adverse outcome. Although arterial blood gas analysis has been extensively evaluated in the clinical diagnostic algorithm of acute PE, it is not a criterion for evaluating the disease risk stratification. Studies have shown that risk stratification of patients with PE can be improved by integrating respiratory features into the 2014 ESC model [11, 12]. Among the parameters used to evaluate hypoxemia, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) was not suitable because most patients were supplied oxygen before blood gas analysis was performed. The PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) ratio, which is measured by the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen, has been used as criterion for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) categories [13]. It was postulated that this ratio could be used to predict outcome in ARDS and several diseases [14–18], but no study has assessed the predictive value of PaO2/FIO2 in patients with acute PE. In this study, we planned to assess the associations of PaO2/FIO2 with the risk of in-hospital mortality using a large registry of patients with PE. First, we aimed to assess the relationship between the PaO2/FIO2 ratio and in-hospital mortality, determine the optimal cutoff value of PaO2/FIO2, and determine if this value, quick and easy to obtain on admission, is a predictor of in-hospital mortality in this population. Second, we aimed to Page 2 of 8 evaluate the potential additional determinants including laboratory parameters that may affect in-hospital mortality. Methods Study design This prospective single-center observational cohort study was conducted in Beijing Hospital from January 2010 to November 2017. Patients with symptomatic objectively confirmed PE were screened. The classification of patients with acute PE was based on the 2014 ESC guideline [4]. We included consecutive patients with acute PE, confirmed by lung scintigraphy or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA); and patients with available data on the Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) score, right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), and serum troponin level, as well as data on in-hospital mortality. Exclusion criteria were patients who were currently enrolled in a therapeutic clinical trial with a blinded therapy or unable to be followed for 3 months, patients with acute myocardial infarction with an elevated troponin I (TNI) or creatine kinase (CK) level, and patients missing any of the variables necessary to calculate PaO2/FIO2. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Hospital (approval notice number: 2013BJYYEC024-01) and China-Japan Friendship Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from participants in accordance with the independent local ethics committee and institutional review board requirements. Data collection Arterial blood gas analysis data were captured on admission. Various clinical parameters, including clinical characteristics, risk factors, laboratory data (troponin and brain natriuretic peptide levels), presence of concomitant deep vein thrombosis (DVT), blood count abnormalities, imaging findings, and in-hospital mortality, were compared between survivors and non-survivors. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The presence of DVT was evaluated by venous ultrasonography of the leg veins in patients clinically suspected of having DVT. PE risk stratification of the patients with complete data was classified according to the 2014 ESC risk stratification model. The sPESI score was assessed as previously described (1 point for each of the following: age > 80 years, systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg, heart rate ≥ 110 beats·min-1, oxygen saturation < 90%, history of cancer, and congestive heart failure or pulmonary diseases) [6]. RVD was assessed by either echocardiography or computed tomography (CT) angiography. Based on echocardiographic findings, RVD was defined by the presence of at least one of the following: 1) right-to-left ventricle end-diastolic diameter ratio > 1 in the apical Wang et al. BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2019) 19:242 Page 3 of 8 four-chamber view, 2) right-to-left ventricle enddiastolic diameter ratio > 0.6 in the parasternal long-axis or subcostal four-chamber view, and 3) right ventricle/ right atrial pressure gradient >30 mmHg [19]. RVD was not considered to have acute onset in the presence of right ventricular wall thickness > 7 mm or documentation of right ventricle overload during previous examinations. At CT angiography, RVD was defined as a rightto-left maximum dimension ratio > 0.9 when measured in the two-dimension axial transverse images at the valvular plane [19]. Statistical analysis Data are expressed as a mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range (IQR), if the data were skewed for continuous variables, and percentages for categorical variables. The continuous variables were compared between the two groups using the Student ttest and Mann-Whitney U test if they were nonnormally distributed. The normality of the continuous variables was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The categorical variables are expressed as a frequency and percentage, and they were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive power between different PaO2/FIO2 ratio values and determine the differences of the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs). In order to determine optimal cutoff values of the best predictive PaO2/FIO2 ratio value, optimum threshold estimation was applied. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results In this study, 408 patients were screened, 40 patients were excluded (25 had missing inpatient records, 2/25 were transferred to another hospital, and 15 lacked PaO2/FIO2 data), and 368 consecutive patients were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1). The median age of the cohort was 76 (IQR 65–83) years, and 179 patients (48.6%) were men. Complete baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Among the 368 patients diagnosed with acute PE by lung scintigraphy or CTPA during the study period, 317 (86.1%) had acute PE confirmed by contrast-enhanced CT, and 51 (13.9%) had acute PE confirmed by ventilation/perfusion lung scan. Three hundred twenty-nine patients (89.4%) underwent a sonographic examination of their leg veins. The groups were compared according to their demographic characteristic, medical history, and predisposing factor of PE. Those who survived to hospital discharge had a higher BMI (24.4 vs. 21.2 kg/m2, P < 0.001) and higher incidence of Fig. 1 Flow diagram for inclusion of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) in the final analysis cancer (41 vs. 11, P < 0.001) than those who did not. There were no significant differences in medical history between the two groups. Clinical characteristic and laboratory findings Table 2 shows the signs, symptoms, and laboratory findings of all patients, and there were no significant differences in symptoms between the two groups. Patients who survived to hospital discharge had a lower pulse rate than those who did not (80.1 ± 14.9 breaths/minute, P = 0.049). Compared with survivors, non-survivors were more likely to have a lower PaO2/FIO2 ratio (202 versus [vs.] 318.1, P < 0.001), higher D-dimer (1140 vs. 816.2 ng/mL, P = 0.002), higher LDH level (269 vs. 196 U/L, P < 0.001), higher cTNI level (0.05 vs. 0.01 ng/mL, P = 0.021), and higher white blood cell (WBC) count (9.3 vs. 6.5 × 109/L, P < 0.001). Severity and outcome of patients Table 3 shows the severity and outcome of the 368 patients, there are 337survivors and 31 non-survivors in this study, the in-hospital mortality is 8.4%(31/368). 345(314 survivors vs 31 non-survivors) patients provided data on the sPESI score, RVD, serum troponin and hemodynamic state for risk stratification according to the 2014 ESC guideline. There are 25 patients with unstable hemodynamic state belonged to the high risk group. Among haemodynamically stable patients (320 patients), sPESI 0 was found in 193 patients (60.3%) and sPESI ≥1 in 127 patients (39.7%). The poportion belonged to the high risk patients of the non-survivors is 35.5%(11/31). The in-hospital mortality for high-risk Wang et al. BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2019) 19:242 Page 4 of 8 Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients Survivors (n = 337, 91.6%) Non-Survivors (n = 31, 8.4%) Total (n = 368) P-value Male sex, n (%) 162 (48.1) 17 (54.8) 179 (48.6) 0.471 Age, years 75 (64–83) 79 (69–84) 76 (65–83) 0.096 24.4 (22–27) 21.2 (20.2–23.5) 24.2 (21.9–26.7) 0.000* 2 BMI, kg/m Medical history, n (%) Hypertension 172 (51.0) 17 (54.8) 189 (51.3) 0.686 Coronary heart disease 65 (19.2) 9 (29.0) 74 (20.1) 0.196 Heart failure 18 (5.3) 2 (6.4) 20 (5.4) 0.794 COPD 20 (5.9) 4 (12.9) 24 (6.5) 0.133 Diabetes mellitus 58 (17.2) 8 (25.8) 64 (17.3) 0.233 Chronic liver disease 2 (0.5) 1 (3.2) 3 (0.8) 0.119 Chronic renal disease 16 (4.7) 3 (9.6) 19 (5.2) 0.236 History of CVA 30 (8.9) 3 (9.6) 33 (9.0) 0.885 History of cancer 41 (12.1) 11 (35.5) 52 (14.1) 0.000* Recent surgery 104 (30.8) 13 (41.9) 117 (31.8) 0.206 Immobilization >3 days 208 (61.7) 23 (74.2) 231 (62.8) 0.170 Varicosity 30 (8.9) 2 (6.5) 32 (8.7) 0.640 History of DVT 42 (12.4) 2 (6.5) 44 (12.0) 0.322 History of PE 51 (15.1) 3 (9.6) 54 (14.7) 0.409 History of trauma 22 (6.5) 1 (3.2) 23 (6.3) 0.466 Smokers 64 (19.0) 7 (22.5) 71 (19.3) 0.346 Predisposing factors, n (%) BMI Body mass index, COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CVA Cerebral vascular accident, DVT Deep vein thrombosis, PE Pulmonary thromboembolism patients is 44%(11/25).There was a significant difference between survivors and non-survivors in risk stratification (P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (17 vs. 10 days, P = 0.011). Optimal cutoff value of PaO2/FIO2 for predicting mortality Figure 2 shows the optimal cutoff value of PaO2/FIO2 for predicting mortality was 265, with a sensitivity of 75.1%, specificity of 77.4%, and AUC of 0.765 (P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression for in-hospital mortality Table 4 shows results from regression analyses. In the final multivariable model, after controlling for confounders, history of cancer (P = 0.029), PaO2/FIO2 ratio < 265 (P = 0.004), and risk stratification (P = 0.043) were associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with acute PE. Discussion In our study cohort, PaO2/FIO2 appeared to be associated with higher in-hospital mortality in patients with acute PE, and the optimal cutoff value of PaO2/FIO2 for predicting mortality was 265. Although there was a significant difference between the survivors and non-survivors in only the pulse rate, there were no significant differences in other signs and symptoms, such as dyspnea, fever, cough, expectoration, etc. (Table 2). There was significant elevation of the WBC count in the non-survivors, which is in accordance with results of another study [20], which showed that the WBC count (OR, 1.9; 95% CI 1.2–3.5) predicted short-term (30-day) mortality following PE. There was a significant elevation of the D-dimer level in the nonsurvivors in this study Klok [21]. showed that high Ddimer levels were also correlated with centrally located pulmonary emboli and 15-day mortality, and there are also several studies evaluated the correlation between Ddimer levels and the burden of PE [22, 23]. We also found a significant difference between survivors and the non-survivors on the LDH level. Until now, there have been few studies about this biomarker. The cTNI was significantly increased in the non-survivors group in this study, Barrios [7] showed that elevated troponin levels were associated with a high all-cause mortality (OR, 4.3; 95% CI,2.1–8.5%), however, he also pointed out that troponin by itself did not appear to clinically significantly change the pretest to posttest probability of death, and the usefulness of basing therapeutic decision making (2019) 19:242 Wang et al. BMC Pulmonary Medicine Page 5 of 8 Table 2 Clinical characteristic of patients Survivors (n = 337, 91.6%) Non-survivors (n = 31, 8.4%) Total P-value Dyspnea 205 20 225 0.687 Fever 49 3 52 0.458 Cough 128 13 141 0.665 Expectoration 105 13 118 0.219 Pleuritic chest pain 51 1 52 0.069 Sign and symptoms, n (%) Syncope 27 2 29 0.758 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 129.2 ± 19.0 127.7 ± 17.6 129.0 ± 13.9 0.738 Pulse rate (beats/min) 80.1 ± 14.9 88.8 ± 19.6 81.0 ± 15.5 0.049* PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission 318.1 (264.6–367.6) 202 (142.9–264.3) 311.4 (252.5–366.3) 0.000* Hemoglobin level, g/L 124.7 ± 21.0 120.1 ± 27.7 125 (113–138) 0.269 White blood cell count, ×10 /L 6.5 (5.1–8.5) 9.3 (7.3–12.5) 6.82 (5.13–8.78) 0.000* Platelet count, ×109/L 207 (162–257) 198 (139–237) 206 (160–256) 0.142 D-dimer level, ng/mL 816.2 (285.5–1832) 1140 (846–2976) 856.0 (299.1–2004) 0.002* CK level, U/L 55 (36–89) 42 (29–77) 54 (35–87) 0.286 Laboratory findings 9 LDH level, U/L 196 (164–243) 269 (216–455) 201 (165–253) 0.000* cTNI level, ng/mL 0.01 (0.01–0.1) 0.05 (0.02–0.19) 0.02 (0.01–0.12) 0.021* BNP level, pg/mL 185.7 (63.2–896.8) 211.6 (119.9–1297.2) 187.75 (66.03–936.6) 0.313 PaO2/FiO2 ratio, arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, CK Creatine kinase, LDH Lactate dehydrogenase; cTNI cardiac troponin I, BNP B-type natriuretic peptide *p < 0.05 solely on troponin levels does not appear warranted. So we combined all the above parameters with other prognostic instruments for PE.After adjusting for body mass index, history of cancer, PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 265, pulse rate, cTNI level, LDH level, WBC count, and D-dimer level, we found that the risk stratification, PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 265, and history of cancer continued to be associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality of acute PE (Table 4). Acute PE impairs the efficient transfer of oxygen across the lung and leads to hypoxia, which is a very important mechanism in the pathogenesis of PE. Hypoxia is responsible for physiological consequences including but not limited to tachycardia, dyspnea, peripheral vasodilatation, and increased cardiac output. Hypoxia-mediated vasoconstriction is one of the causes of acute pulmonary hypertension, which is an important mechanism of acute right heart failure in PE [24]. These factors also lead to long-term outcomes like pulmonary hypertension or right ventricular failure [24]. However, hypoxia is not a criterion for evaluating disease risk stratification yet. Studies have shown that risk stratification of patients with PE can be improved by integrating respiratory features into the 2014 ESC model [11, 12]. Among the parameters used to describe hypoxia, PaO2 is the most common parameter, but it was not suitable for most patients with PE who were supplied oxygen on admission. One study on other parameters provided evidence that oxygen saturation or the respiratory rate Table 3 Severity and outcome of patients Survivors (n = 337, 91.6%) Non-survivors (n = 31, 8.4%) PE risk stratification n = 314 n = 31 High risk, n (%) 14 (4.5) 11 (35.5) Inter mediate risk, n (%) 118 (37.6) 9 (29.0) Low risk, n (%) 182 (58.0) 11 (35.5) Length of hospital stay, days, median (IQR) 17 (12–24) 10 (6–23) PE Pulmonary thromboembolism, IQR Interquartile range *p < 0.05 P-value 0.000* 0.011* Wang et al. BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2019) 19:242 Page 6 of 8 Fig. 2 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the PaO2/FIO2 on admission PaO2/FIO2, arterial partial pressure of oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen could be added to the 2014 ESC strategy for risk stratification in order to further identify hemodynamically stable patients with PE at increased risk for death who are potentially candidates for more aggressive treatment [11]. Another study showed that both sPESI and pulse oximetry measurements are moderately accurate identifiers of low-risk patients with PE [25]. Although the PaO2/FIO2 ratio is widely used in the clinical setting for evaluating hypoxemia, there is some doubt about it [26, 27]. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio was used as a predictor of outcome in patients Table 4 Multivariable logistic regression analysis of in-hospital mortality OR 95% CI P-value BMI 0.945 0.824–1.084 0.421 Pulse rate 1.016 0.988–1.045 0.259 History of cancer 4.3 1.161–15.927 0.029* PaO2/FiO2 < 265 6.310 1.823–21.483 0.004* White blood cell count 1.098 0.947–1.275 0.216 D-dimer level 1.000 1.000–1.000 0.603 Elevated LDH level 1.992 0.670–5.921 0.215 cTNI level 0.847 0.56–1.28 0.430 Severity of PE stratification 4.214 1.047–16.957 0.043* OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, BMI Body mass index, PaO2/FiO2 Arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen, LDH Lactate dehydrogenase, cTNI cardiac troponin I, PE Pulmonary thromboembolism *p < 0.05 with ARDS, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and cardiac surgery [14–18]. Studies also showed that the PaO2/FIO2 is not an independent predictor of mortality in patients with ARDS in multivariate analyses that controlled for other measures of severity of illness [28]. Because of the mechanism of right-to-left shunt, the variation of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio with an increasing FIO2 is complex [29]. It have been demonstrated that the PaO2/FIO2 ratio and its variation with changes in FIO2 depends on many clinical variables, and it may not be the only parameter for determining the state of arterial hypoxemia. In our cohort, PaO2/ FIO2 ratio < 265 was related to the in-hospital mortality of patients with acute PE. Low values of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio may due to both the pathological conditions of the respiratory disease and alterations in the hemodynamic status of acute PE. In our study, PaO2/FIO2 ratios were lower in patients at risk, so a simple determination of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio at <265 may provide important information about poor in-hospital prognosis. It is supposed that the hemodynamically stable patients with PaO2/FIO2 ratio < 265 may need more surveillance. According to the 2014 ESC model, high-risk PE is characterized by overt hemodynamic instability and the need for immediate advanced therapy, including consideration of fibrinolysis [30], and further study is warranted to determine whether the patients with a PaO2/FIO2 ratio at <265 are potentially candidates for more aggressive treatment. Wang et al. BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2019) 19:242 Limitations The current study was a single-center observational study. However, our study is the largest prospective study to date that addresses the PaO2/FIO2 ratio for PE. Our results may be clinically relevant since a simple determination of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio may provide very important information for determining in-hospital mortality of patients with acute PE. In addition, despite its single-center design, our results showed consistency with other respiratory features in previous reports related to the in-hospital mortality of acute PE. Hypoxia also leads to long-term effects of the compensatory mechanisms of PE, such as pulmonary hypertension or right ventricular failure; therefore, future studies need to determine whether these factors affect the long-term outcome of this corhort . Conclusions In summary, the PaO2/FIO2 ratio may be useful for identifying in-hospital mortality of patients with acute PE on admission. PaO2/FIO2 ratios are lower in patients at risk, and the value of 265 is the cutoff point of predicting in-hospital mortality. A simple determination of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio at <265 may provide important information about patients’ in-hospital prognosis, and these patients may need more surveillance. Integrating respiratory features into the 2014 ESC risk stratification model of PE is also important, and future studies or clinical trials will be required to clarify the clinical utility of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in a larger sample of patients. Abbreviations (sPESI) score: Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index; ARDS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CK: Creatine kinase; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CT: Computed tomography; CTPA: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography; CVA: Cerebral vascular accident; DVT: Deep vein thrombosis; ESC: European Society of Cardiology; IQR: Interquartile range; PaO2/FIO2: Arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen; PE: Pulmonary embolism; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; RVD: Right ventricular dysfunction; TNI: Troponin I; vs.: versus; WBC: white blood cell Acknowledgments We thank Professor Ping Zeng for helping with the data analysis. Authors’ contributions XX and YW contributed to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of the data, and interpretation of the results and drafted the manuscript. HY, LQ, ZT, JJ, JY, LZ, and BF contributed to the data collection, analysis, and interpretation. All authors have read and approved the manuscript, and ensure that this is the case. Funding This project was supported by project grant 2011BAI11B17from the Project of National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China During the 12th Five-year Plan Period, China; grant 2016YFC0905602, from the Project of National Precision Medical Research of China During the 13th Five-year Plan Period, China; grant BJ-2016-036 from Beijing Hospital Nova Project, Beijing Hospital. No funding provider had any influence on the design of the study or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or the content of this paper. Page 7 of 8 Availability of data and materials The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Ethics approval and consent to participate The data used in this study were part of our project “The Projects of National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China During the 12th Five-year Plan Period (grant number [no.]: 2011BAI11B17) and Projects of National Precision Medical Research of China During the 13th Five-year Plan Period (grant no. 2016YFC0905602), which was approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Hospital (approval notice number: 2013BJYYEC-024-01) and China-Japan Friendship Hospital. Written informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Received: 28 January 2019 Accepted: 22 November 2019 References 1. Aujesky D, Jiménez D, Mor MK, Geng M, Fine MJ, Ibrahim SA. Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality after acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2009;119:962–8. 2. Stein PD, Henry JW. Prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism among patients in a general hospital and at autopsy. Chest. 1995;108:978–81. 3. Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galiè N, Pruszczyk P, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2276–315. 4. Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galiè N, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3033–69. 5. Jen WY, Jeon YS, Kojodjojo P, Lee EHE, Lee YH, Ren YP, et al. A new model for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029618808922. 6. Jimenez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, Gómez V, Lobo JL, Uresandi F, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1383–9. 7. Barrios D, Yusen RD, Jiménez D. Risk stratification for proven acute pulmonary embolism: what information is needed? Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;38:11–7. 8. Elias A, Mallett S, Daoud-Elias M, Poggi JN, Clarke M. Prognostic models in acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010324. 9. Becattini C, Agnelli G, Lankeit M, Masotti L, Pruszczyk P, Casazza F, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: mortality prediction by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification model. Eur Respir J. 2016;48:780–6. 10. Jiménez D, Lobo JL, Barrios D, Prandoni P, Yusen RD. Risk stratification of patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Intern Emerg Med. 2016;11:11–8. 11. Becattini C, Vedovati MC, Pruszczyk P, Vanni S, Cotugno M, Cimini LA, et al. Oxygen saturation or respiratory rate to improve risk stratification in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:2397–402. 12. Erol S, Gürün Kaya A, Arslan Ciftçi F, Çiledağ A, Şen E, Kaya A, et al. Is oxygen saturation variable of simplified pulmonary embolism severity index reliable for identification of patients, suitable for outpatient treatment. Clin Respir J. 2018;12:762–6. 13. Definition Task Force ARDS, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND. Caldwell E, et al. acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–33. 14. Villar J, Ambrós A, Soler JA, Martínez D, Ferrando C, Solano R, et al. Age, PaO2/FiO2, and plateau pressure score: a proposal for a simple outcome score in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1361–9. Wang et al. BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2019) 19:242 15. Esteve F, Lopez-Delgado JC, Javierre C, Skaltsa K, Carrio ML, RodríguezCastro D, et al. Evaluation of the PaO2/FiO2 ratio after cardiac surgery as a predictor of outcome during hospital stay. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:83. 16. Lai CC, Sung MI, Liu HH, Chen CM, Chiang SR, Liu WL, et al. The ratio of partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen 1 day after acute respiratory distress syndrome onset can predict the outcomes of involving patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e3333. 17. Gentili A, Pasini L, Iannella E, Landuzzi V, Lima M, Bacchi Reggiani ML, et al. Predictive outcome indexes in neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:1602–7. 18. Narayanan A, Batra P, Faridi MMA, Harit D. PaO2/FiO2 ratio as predictor of mortality in neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Perinatol. 2018;36:609–14. 19. Becattini C, Agnelli G, Vedovati MC, Pruszczyk P, Casazza F, Grifoni S, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis and risk stratification in a single test. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1657–63. 20. Jo JY, Lee MY, Lee JW, Rho BH, Choi WI. Leukocytes and systemic inflammatory response syndrome as prognostic factors in pulmonary embolism patients. BMC Pulm Med. 2013;13:74. 21. Klok FA, Djurabi RK, Nijkeuter M, Eikenboom HC, Leebeek FW, Kramer MH, et al. High D-dimer level is associated with increased 15-d and 3 months mortality through a more central localization of pulmonary emboli and serious comorbidity. Br J Haematol. 2008;140:218–22. 22. Keller K, Beule J, Balzer JO, Dippold W. D-dimer and thrombus burden in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36:1613–8. 23. Aujesky D, Roy PM, Guy M, Cornuz J, Sanchez O, Perrier A. Prognostic value of D-dimer in patients with pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2006; 96:478–82. 24. Kim V, Benditt JO, Wise RA, Sharafkhaneh A. Oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5:513–8. 25. Nordenholz K, Ryan J, Atwood B, Heard K. Pulmonary embolism risk stratification: pulse oximetry and pulmonary embolism severity index. J Emerg Med. 2011;40:95–102. 26. Gould MK, Ruoss SJ, Rizk NW, Doyle RL, Raffin TA. Indices of hypoxemia in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: reliability, validity, and clinical usefulness. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:6–8. 27. Gowda MS, Klocke RA. Variability of indices of hypoxaemia in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:41–5. 28. DesPrez K, McNeil JB, Wang C, Bastarache JA, Shaver CM, Ware LB. Oxygenation saturation index predicts clinical outcomes in ARDS. Chest. 2017;152:1151–8. 29. Whiteley JP, Gavaghan DJ, Hahn CE. Variation of venous admixture, SF6 shunt, PaO2, and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio with FIO2. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:771–8. 30. Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, Agnelli G, Becattini C, Beyer-Westendorf J, et al. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1402–11. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Page 8 of 8