Nội dung

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 9 Number 8 (2020) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.908.114 Relative Adequacy of ZNSO4.7H2O and ZN EDTA on the Photosynthetic Characters and Yield Attributes of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L) Babyrani Panda and M. B. Doddamani* Department of Crop Physiology, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580005, Karnataka, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Keywords Zinc, phenophases, leaf area, chlorophyll, SPAD value, photosynthetic characters, yield attributes Article Info Accepted: 10 July 2020 Available Online: 10 August 2020 A field experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad during kharif 2017 to elucidate relative efficiency of ZnSO4.7H2O and Zn EDTA on the photosynthetic character and yield attributes of pearl millet variety ICMV-221. Two sources of Zn i.e. ZnSO4.7H2O and Zn EDTA were soil applied as basal dose @ 0 (control), 5, 10, 15 and 20 kg ha -1 before the sowing. Application of 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA showed earlier attainment of growth stages viz. flag leaf initiation, 50 % flowering and milky stage whereas physiological maturity was late. Leaf area, Chlorophyll content, SPAD value, leaf Zn content, photosynthetic characters, yield attributes viz. grain yield plant-1, grain yield ha-1, test weight, harvest index also reported being highest with 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA followed by 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O, indicating the efficiency of Zn EDTA compared to ZnSO4.7H2O. Introduction Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) the vital arid and semi-arid crop of India (Ramesh et al., 2006) cultivated as both food and feed in over 8.3 m ha (Yadav et al., 2011) and 27 m ha everywhere throughout the world. It is one of the major crops of China, India, South Eastern Asia, Sudan, Pakistan, Russia and Nigeria and comprises around 75 per cent of the total cereal production and represents an essential part of local diets (Lestienne et al., 2005). In India major pearl millet growing states are Maharashtra, Gujarat and Rajasthan where pearl millet contributes for 20 to 63 per cent of the total cereal consumption (Rao et al., 2006). On account of its resilience to difficult growing conditions, it tends to be grown in areas where other cereal crops, such as maize or wheat wouldn’t survive. The ongoing spurt in costs of wheat, rice and maize and growing demand for non-food uses (cattle and poultry feed, alcohol and starch industries) pearl millet become cheaper alternative sources (Reddy et al., 2013). Further, the nutritional value of these crops 1043 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 offers much scope to the development of value enriched products in new health conscious consumer segments (Yadav et al., 2011) as it contains more fibre and is good for diabetic and heart patients. However, Pearlmillet production is seriously hampered by some biotic and abiotic factors, thereby reducing its yield. Mineral nutrition is considered as the major limiting factor for productivity especially Zn, which is essential for the normal healthy growth and reproduction of the plant. The decline in the crop yield due to Zn deficiency comes from the reduction in a photosynthetic activity which causes reduced dry matter production. Zinc inadequacy induces overall inefficiency in net photosynthesis by 50 to 70% depending upon plant species and degree of insufficiency (Seethambaram and Das, 1985; Pandey and Sharma, 1989; Shrotri et al., 1989; Hu and Sparks, 1991; Brown et al., 1993). Zinc is a component of plant carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzyme which is directly involved in photosynthesis, encouraging the diffusion of CO2 through the liquid phase of the cell to the chloroplast (Tobin, 1970, Nelson et al., 1969; Hatch and Slack, 1970). Zn deficiency also hampers stomatal conductance and transpiration rate. As Pearl millet is a C4 plant which requires high CA activity is highly affected by Zn deficiency. Zn deficiency in plant occurs due to low soil Zn accessibility, which is ascribed to Zn fixation by free CaCO3 in alkaline calcareous soil. So, there is a need to improve the soil Zn availability by application of Zn fertilizer to the soil. Keeping these views in mind a field experiment was conducted to see the relative efficiency of ZnSO4.7H2O and Zn EDTA on the photosynthetic character and yield attributes of pearl millet. Materials and Methods A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2017 at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (latitude: 150 26’ N, longitude: 750 07’ E, altitude: 678 m). The objective was to unearth the effect of soil Zn fertilization on crop phenophases, leaf area, leaf zinc content, chlorophyll content, gas exchange character and yield attributes of pearl millet. Soil properties and treatment details The site of the experimental site was a deep black clay soil with 0.53 mg kg-1 available soil Zn content. The variety of ICMV-221 was used as the test crop. Two sources of Zn i.e. ZnSO4.7H2O and Zn EDTA were used as basal dose @ 0 (control), 5, 10, 15 and 20 kg ha-1 were soil applied as basal dose @ 0 (control), 5, 10, 15 and 20 kg ha-1 before the sowing. At the time of sowing it was fertilized with 50:25:0 kg ha-1 N: P2O5: K2O. Crop phenophases Crop phenophases viz. days to flag leaf initiation, 50 % flowering, milky stage and physiological maturity of five randomly tagged plants from each plot were recorded from the days of sowing. Leaf area Leaf area per plant was calculated at 30 DAS, 60 DAS and at harvest by length and breadth method. The sum of all the leaves per plant was expressed in decimeter square (dm2). Leaf Zn content For estimation of leaf Zn content, leaf samples were collected at 50 % and harvesting stage. Samples were washed properly with distilled water, dried under shade and then in a hot air oven at 650C till a constant weight was obtained and samples were powdered. The diacid (HNO3: HClO4) digested samples were used for Zn estimation 1044 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 with atomic absorption spectrophotometer (GBS Avanta Ver. 2.02 Model, Germany) (Tandon, 1998). Results and Discussion Effect of Zn application on phenophases of bajra SPAD value and chlorophyll content Relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value) was measured using SPAD chlorophyll meter at 30 and 60 DAS. Chlorophyll content (mg g1 fresh weight) was also measured on a fully expanded third leaf from the top by DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide) method at 30 and 60 DAS (Shoaf and Lium, 1976). Photosynthetic parameters The net photosynthetic rate (µ mol CO2 m-2 s1 ), stomatal conductance (µ mol m-2 s-1) and transpiration rate (µ mol H2O m-2 s-1) were measured by using portable IRGA (Lichor 6400-XT) system at 30 and 60 DAS. Yield attributes Grain yield plant-1 (g), grain yield ha-1 (kg ha1 ), test weight (g) and harvest index were noted after harvesting of the crop to verify the effect of Zn application on the yield attributes. The performance of a crop depends largely on its phenophases in terms of yield. In the present investigation, it has been observed that days to flag leaf initiation, 50 per cent flowering and milky stage were comparatively earlier in the treatments receiving 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA (36.67, 49 and 55.33 days respectively) and 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O (37, 49 and 56.67 days respectively) than that of control (39, 51.33 and 61.67 days respectively) (Table 1). A higher dose of Zn, an activator of growth hormone indole acetic acid (IAA) may be attributed to the sound crop growth rate. Whereas, the physiological maturity was late in 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA (84.33 days) and 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O (83.33 days) application compared to control (79 days). This might be ascribed to the larger accumulation of photosynthates in grain which persisted for a longer period in Zn treated plots (Ullah et al., (2002) and Kumar and Bohra (2014). Leaf area to soil Zn application Statistical analysis Statistical analysis and the data interpretation was as per the Gomez and Gomez (1984) and the treatment means were computed by applying Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The mean values of treatments subjected to DMRT using the corresponding error mean sum of squares and degrees of freedom values at five per cent probability under MSTATC programme. Correlation studies were made between leaf Zn content at 50% flowering and SPAD value and the photosynthetic rate at 60 DAS at five per cent probability level was according to Panse and Sukhatme (1967). Leaf area plant-1 recorded maximum when treated with 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA (7.13, 28.70 and 19.87 dm2 respectively) followed by 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O treatment (6.67, 28.68 and 19.66 dm2 respectively) and minimum leaf area plant-1 was observed in the control plot (4.82,22.78 and 15.37 dm2 respectively) at 30 DAS, 60 DAS and at harvest (Table 2). This might be due to the role of Zn in auxin metabolism which helps in cell division and cell elongation resulting in increased leaf area (Anand (2007), Saleh and Maftoun (2008), Dore (2016) and Potanna (2017). 1045 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 Table.1 Effect of Zn biofortification on phenological traits in bajra Treatments T1: RDF (Control) T2:RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 5 kg ha-1 T3: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 10 kg ha-1 T4: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 15 kg ha-1 T5: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 20 kg ha-1 T6: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 5 kg ha-1 T7: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 10 kg ha -1 T8: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 15 kg ha -1 T9: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 20 kg ha-1 Mean S.Em. ± L.S.D. @ 5 % Flag leaf initiation (days) 39.00ab 40.67a 37.33ab 36.67b 37.00ab 37.00ab 36.67b 37.33ab 36.67b 37.59 1.17 3.51 50 % flowering (days) 51.33ab 53.00ab 51.33ab 52.00ab 51.33ab 52.00ab 54.67a 51.33ab 49.00b 51.78 1.50 4.51 Milk stage (days) 61.67a 59.33ab 56.67ab 56.67ab 56.67ab 57.67ab 57.67ab 57.33ab 55.33b 57.74 1.71 5.12 Physiological maturity (days) 79.00ab 76.00b 79.00ab 80.00ab 83.33ab 80.67ab 80.00ab 83.00ab 84.33a 80.59 2.39 7.15 RDF: Recommended dose of fertilizer Means within a column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different according to DMRT (P = 0.05) Table.2 Effect of Zn biofortification on leaf area and leaf Zn content in bajra Treatments T1: RDF (Control) T2:RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 5 kg ha-1 T3: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 10 kg ha-1 T4: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 15 kg ha-1 T5: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 20 kg ha-1 T6: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 5 kg ha-1 T7: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 10 kg ha-1 T8: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 15 kg ha-1 T9: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 20 kg ha -1 Mean S.Em. ± L.S.D. @ 5 % Leaf area plant-1 (dm2) 30 DAS 60 DAS At harvest 4.82d 22.78c 15.37d b-d bc 5.31 23.67 15.43d b-d ab 5.57 26.33 17.18b-d a-d ab 5.85 27.02 18.18a-c ab a 6.67 28.68 19.66a cd a-c 5.04 25.27 16.29cd a-d ab 5.73 27.02 18.07a-c 6.52a-c 28.38a 19.22ab a a 7.13 28.70 19.87a 5.85 26.43 17.70 0.45 1.09 0.70 1.36 3.26 2.09 RDF: Recommended dose of fertilizer DAS: Days after sowing Means within a column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different according to DMRT (P = 0.05) 1046 Leaf Zn content (mg kg-1) At 50 % flowering At harvest 29.87d 26.19d d 30.51 27.26cd cd 31.12 28.42cd b-d 33.28 31.69ab b 37.04 32.92a d 30.96 27.92cd cd 31.94 29.74bc 35.06bc 32.03ab a 40.82 34.01a 33.40 30.02 1.22 0.93 3.65 2.79 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 Table.3 Effect of Zn biofortification on relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value) and chlorophyll content in bajra at 30 DAS and 60 DAS Treatments Relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value) 30 DAS c Chlorophyll-a (mg g-1 fresh weight) 60 DAS 45.20 c 30 DAS 1.05 d 60 DAS Total chlorophyll (mg g-1 fresh weight) 30 DAS 30 DAS 60 DAS 0.45 c 1.34 e 60 DAS 1.99e 35.24 T2:RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 5 kg ha-1 36.02bc 48.46bc 1.21b-d 1.56c 0.35bc 0.45c 1.56c-e 2.01e T3: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 10 kg ha-1 38.94a-c 51.84a-c 1.42a-c 1.80bc 0.39a-c 0.53a-c 1.82a-c 2.33cd T4: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 15 kg ha-1 41.14a 55.67ab 1.49ab 1.90ab 0.42ab 0.59a-c 1.91a-c 2.49a-d T5: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 20 kg ha-1 42.30a 56.39ab 1.58a 2.03ab 0.47a 0.67ab 2.05ab 2.70ab T6: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 5 kg ha-1 38.21a-c 50.63a-c 1.10cd 1.76bc 0.30c 0.48bc 1.40de 2.24de T7: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 10 kg ha-1 40.21ab 53.67ab 1.36a-d 1.83ab 0.38a-c 0.55a-c 1.73b-d 2.38b-d T8: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 15 kg ha-1 41.97a 56.20ab 1.58a 1.98ab 0.46a 0.63a-c 2.04ab 2.61a-c T9: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 20 kg ha-1 42.47a 56.91a 1.65a 2.08a 0.47a 0.71a 2.12a 2.79a Mean 39.61 52.78 1.38 1.83 0.39 0.56 1.77 2.39 S.Em. ± 1.40 2.48 0.09 0.08 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.11 L.S.D. @ 5 % 4.20 7.43 0.30 0.24 0.09 0.17 0.35 0.30 1047 0.29 c T1: RDF (Control) DF: Recommended dose of fertilizer DAS: Days after sowing Means within a column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different according to DMRT (P = 0.05) 1.54 c Chlorophyll-b (mg g-1 fresh weight) Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 Table.4 Effect of Zn biofortification on photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate in bajra at different growth stages Treatments T1: RDF (Control) T2:RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 5 kg ha-1 T3: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 10 kg ha-1 T4: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 15 kg ha-1 T5: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 20 kg ha-1 T6: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 5 kg ha-1 T7: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 10 kg ha-1 T8: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 15 kg ha-1 T9: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 20 kg ha-1 Mean S.Em. ± L.S.D. @ 5 % Photosynthetic rate (µmol CO2 m-2 s-1) 30 DAS 60 DAS c 21.79 32.95b 22.76bc 32.98b 23.46bc 36.92ab 24.39a-c 37.80a 25.70ab 38.59a 22.84bc 34.56ab 23.73bc 37.03ab 25.03ab 38.26a 26.76a 38.96a 24.05 36.45 0.92 1.32 2.75 3.97 Stomatal conductance (µmol m-2 s-1) 30 DAS 60 DAS c 0.10 0.22d 0.11c 0.23cd 0.11c 0.26cd 0.15ab 0.33ab 0.17a 0.36a 0.11c 0.24cd 0.13bc 0.29bc 0.17a 0.35a 0.18a 0.38a 0.14 0.30 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 DF: Recommended dose of fertilizer DAS: Days after sowing Means within a column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different according to DMRT (P = 0.05) 1048 Transpiration rate (µmol H2O m-2 s-1) 30 DAS 60 DAS c 1.39 4.00c 1.41c 4.18c 1.80bc 4.72a-c 2.01ab 5.24a-c 2.38a 5.81a 1.42c 4.27bc 1.86a-c 4.96a-c 2.31ab 5.74ab 2.41a 5.91a 1.89 4.98 0.17 0.46 0.51 1.37 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 Table.5 Effect of Zn biofortification on yield attributes in bajra Treatments Grain yield plant-1 (g) Grain yield (kg ha-1) Test weight (g) Harvest index T1: RDF (Control) 21.10b 3276c 10.43b 30.63b T2:RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 5 kg ha-1 21.82b 3379bc 10.97ab 30.76b T3: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 10 kg ha-1 22.44ab 3563a-c 11.50ab 30.98ab T4: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 15 kg ha-1 24.57ab 3983ab 11.90ab 31.78ab T5: RDF + Basal application of ZnSO4.7H2O @ 20 kg ha-1 25.55ab 4095a 12.37a 33.14ab T6: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 5 kg ha-1 22.37ab 3549a-c 11.17ab 31.41ab T7: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 10 kg ha-1 23.42ab 3763a-c 11.73ab 30.76b T8: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 15 kg ha-1 25.35ab 4066a 12.23ab 32.17ab T9: RDF + Basal application of Zn EDTA @ 20 kg ha-1 26.65a 4153a 12.77a 34.32a Mean 23.70 3758 11.67 31.77 S.Em. ± 1.31 195.6 0.547 1.05 L.S.D. @ 5 % 3.93 586.4 1.64 3.11 F: Recommended dose of fertilizer Means within a column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different according to DMRT (P = 0.05) 1049 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 Fig.1 Correlation between leaf Zn content at 50% flowering and SPAD value at 60 DAS Fig.2 Correlation between leaf Zn content at 50 % flowering and photosynthetic rate at 60 DAS \ Leaf Zn content with soil Zn application Leaf Zn content increased with increase in Zn fertilizer dose and recorded highest in 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA treated plot at both 50 % flowering and harvesting (40.82 and 34.01 mg kg-1 respectively) followed by 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O treated plot (37.04 and 32.92 mg kg-1 respectively) and lowest was observed in control (29.87 and 26.19 mg kg-1 respectively) (Table 2). Leaf Zn content decreased at the harvesting stage which might be ascribed to the remobilization of Zn to the grain after flowering for seed formation. Higher accumulation of Zn in Zn EDTA application might be due to its slow releasing nature and greater availability in the rhizosphere (Imtiaz et al., (2003), Karak et 1050 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 al., (2005), Raghavendra (2013), Rasul et al., (2014), Prasad et al., (2015) and Choudhary et al., (2016)). SPAD value to soil Zn application The relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value) is the quantification of the greenness of the leaves. Earlier studies in rabi sorghum (Anand, 2007), rice (Kabeya and Shankar, 2013) and bread wheat (Raghavendra, 2013) showed that an increase in relative chlorophyll content due to Zn application. This might be attributed to the fact that application of Zn enhanced the chlorophyll content of the leaf. In the present study also, 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA application (42.47 and 56.91 respectively) significantly increased the relative chlorophyll content over control (35.24 and 45.20 respectively) and this is immediately followed by 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O (42.30 and 56.39 respectively) at 30 and 60 DAS (Table 3). Chlorophyll application content with soil Zn The indirect role of Zinc in chlorophyll biosynthesis by participating in the enzyme catalysis and protein functioning which are essential for chlorophyll synthesis and also in protecting the chloroplast membrane from disruption are well documented (Balashouri, 1995 and Hisamitsu et al., 2001). The passive role of Zinc were also confirmed by Saleh and Maftoun (2008), Akay (2011), Rana and Kashif (2014) and Samreen et al., (2017). In the present investigation also the role of Zinc in the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll content significantly increased from 30 DAS (1.38, 0.39 and 1.77 mg g-1 fresh weight respectively) to 60 DAS (1.83, 0.56 and 2.39 mg g-1 fresh respectively) (Table 3). The chlorophyll content was maximum when treated with 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA, followed by 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O and the lowest was noted in the absolute control. There is an indirect influence of Effect of soil Zn Photosynthetic traits application on The rate of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate increased with increase in the Zn supplementation reporting maximum in the treatment receiving 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA, followed by 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O and significantly lowest was reported in the control (Table 4). A significant increase of photosynthetic activity at 30 DAS (24.05 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1, 0.14 µmol m-2 s-1 and 1.89 µmol H2O m-2 s-1respectively) to 60 DAS (36.45 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1, 0.30 µmol m-2 s-1 and 4.98 µmol H2O m-2 s-1respectively) was evidenced due to Zn application. The role of Zn in regulating stomatal conductance, which is a function of density, size and degree of opening of stomata, causes greater photosynthesis is well established (Sharma et al., 1995). The increase in the rate of photosynthesis in response to Zn application attributed to its role in carbonic anhydrase enzyme activity (Cakmak and Engels, 1999). In response to this transpiration rate also increased, as higher photosynthesis leads to rapid utilization of CO2 resulting in greater uptake of CO2 coupled with the expense of H2O. Ahmed et al., (2009) in cotton and Liu et al., (2016) in summer maize observed similar results due to Zn application as obtained in the present investigation. Correlation study The increase in the SPAD value, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate mentioned above is attributed to the increase in the leaf Zn content when fertilized with ZnSO4.7H2O and Zn EDTA. Leaf Zn content at 50 % flowering stage showed a significant and positive correlation with relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value) (r2=0.639) (Fig 1) and the photosynthetic rate (r2=0.632) at 60 DAS 1051 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(8): 1043-1054 (Fig 2), which increased lucidly with an increase in the leaf Zn content. Effect of soil Zn application on Yield attributes Increased photosynthetic rate resulted in greater biomass accumulation and mobilization of a major part of it to the grains which will reflect in the harvest index. So, increase in the grain yield plant-1, grain yield ha-1, test weight and harvest index were due to Zn application (Kumar et al., (2015), Ghoneim (2016), Potanna (2017) and Singh and Pandey (2017)). Significant variation in yield to the Zinc application was recorded in the present study. At 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA (26.65 g plant-1, 4153 kg ha-1, 12.77 g and 34.32 respectively), followed by 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O (25.55 g plant-1, 4095 kg ha-1 12.37 g and 33.14 respectively) and significantly lowest was reported in the control (21.10 g plant-1, 3276 kg ha-1, 10.43 g and 30.63 respectively) (Table 5). Relative efficiency of ZnSO4.7H2O and Zn EDTA It has been observed from the experiment that the use of Zn EDTA served the crop better in terms of chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate and harvest index as compared to ZnSO4.7H2O. Higher water solubility (100%) and slow releasing character of Zn EDTA as it is chelated might be the reason for its higher efficiency than ZnSO4.7H2O. It is concluded from the experiment that soil Zn application during sowing leads to the earlier attainment of growth stages viz. flag leaf initiation, 50 % flowering and milky stage whereas physiological maturity was late in Zn treated plot which led to higher grain filling. Leaf Zn content was also higher when supplied with Zn as compared to control due to which a significant increase in the leaf area, chlorophyll content, SPAD value and photosynthetic rate was observed. Ultimately increased photosynthetic rate resulted in higher grain yield plant-1, grain yield ha-1, test weight and harvest index in Zn treated plot. Plots receiving 20 kg ha-1 Zn EDTA showed the best result followed by 20 kg ha-1 ZnSO4.7H2O. So, Zn EDTA identified as a more efficient source for Zn nutrition than ZnSO4.7H2O. References Ahmed, N., Ahmad, F., Abid, M. and Ullah, A. M. 2009. Impact of zinc fertilization on gas exchange characteristics and water use efficiency of cotton crop under arid environment. Pakistan J. Bot., 41(5): 21892197. Akay, A. 2011. Effect of zinc fertilizer applications on yield and element contents of some registered chickpeas varieties. African J. Biotechnol., 10(60): 1289012896. Anand, R. 2007. Evaluation of rabi sorghum genotypes for seed zinc content and zinc use efficiency. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. Balashouri, P. 1995. Effect of zinc on germination, growth and pigment content and phytomass of Vigna radiate and Sorghum bicolor. J. Ecobiol., 7: 109-114. Brown, H.P., I. Cakmak and Q. Zhang. 1993. Form and Function of Zinc in lants. pp. 93102. In: Zinc in Soils and Plants. (Ed.): A.D. Robson. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 93-102. Cakmak, I. and Engels, C. 1999. Role of mineral nutrients in photosynthesis and yield formation. The Haworth Press, New York. pp. 141-168. Choudhary, G. L., Rana, K. S., Rana, D. S., Bana, R. S., Prajapat, K. and Choudhary, M. 2016. Moisture management and zinc fortification impacts on economics, quality and nutrient uptake of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) under rainfed conditions. Indian J. Agril. Sci., 86(1): 717. 1052