Nội dung

Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Modification of elastic stable intramedullary nailing with a 3rd nail in a femoral spiral fracture model – results of biomechanical testing and a prospective clinical study Martin M Kaiser1*, Christine Stratmann1, Gregor Zachert1,3, Maaike Schulze-Hessing1, Nina Gros1, Rebecca Eggert1 and Marion Rapp2 Abstract Background: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the standard treatment for displaced diaphyseal femoral fractures in children. However, high complication rates (10-50%) are reported in complex fractures. This biomechanical study compares the stiffness with a 3rd nail implanted to that in the classical 2C-shaped configuration and presents the application into clinical practice. Methods: For each of the 3 configurations of ESIN-osteosynthesis with titanium nails eight composite femoral grafts (Sawbones®) with an identical spiral fracture were used: 2C configuration (2C-shaped nails, 2 × 3.5 mm), 3CM configuration (3rd nail from medial) and 3CL configuration (3rd nail from lateral). Each group underwent biomechanical testing in 4-point bending, internal/external rotation and axial compression. Results: 2C and 3CM configurations showed no significant differences in this spiroid type fracture model. 3CL had a significantly higher stiffness during anterior-posterior bending, internal rotation and 9° compression than 2C, and was stiffer in the lateral-medial direction than 3CM. The 3CL was less stable during p-a bending and external rotation than both the others. As biomechanical testing showed a higher stability for the 3CL configuration in two (a-p corresponding to recurvation and 9° compression to shortening) of three directions associated with the most important clinical problems, we added a 3rd nail in ESIN-osteosynthesis for femoral fractures. 11 boys and 6 girls (2.5-15 years) were treated with modified ESIN of whom 12 were ‘3CL’; due to the individual character of the fractures 4 patients were treated with ‘3CM’ (third nail from medial) and as an exception 1 adolescent with 4 nails and one boy with plate osteosynthesis. No additional stabilizations or re-operations were necessary. All patients achieved full points in the Harris-Score at follow-up; no limb length discrepancy occurred. Conclusion: The 3CL configuration provided a significantly higher stiffness than 2C and 3CM configurations in this biomechanical model. These results were successfully transmitted into clinical practice. All children, treated by 3CL or 3CM according to the individual character of each fracture, needed no additional stabilization and had no Re-Do operations. As a consequence, at our hospital all children with femoral diaphyseal fractures with open physis are treated with this modified ESIN-technique. Keywords: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing, Biomechanical testing, Fracture, Femur, Treatment, Children, Adolescents * Correspondence: kaiser@uni-luebeck.de 1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratezburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2014 Kaiser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 Background In children fractures of the femoral diaphysis occur in around 2-3% of all fractures and is the second most frequent localization affecting the lower extremity. The guidelines of the German Society of Pediatric Surgery recommend elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for displaced fractures even in complex or spiral fractures for children older than 2- to 3-years-of-age [1]. This is based upon reported rapid recovery, fast reintegration of the patients, a reduction of the possible negative effects of immobilization and few to no complications. Further on, elastic stable nails are preferred to avoid any possible damage to the open physis and the possible complication of avascular necrosis of the femoral head following the implantation of a rigid nail [2-7]. The technique mostly used is the so called 2-C-shaped configuration, in which two nails are implanted in an ascendig matter from the distal metaphysis of the femur [8-11]. On the other hand, skin problems and soft tissue irritation are well-known problems and some publications reported complications in up to 50% of cases with an increased tendency towards complex fracture types and older children weighting more than 40 kg [12-17]. As a consequence of this type of problem, other authors prefer submuscular plating [18,19] or external fixation for those instable fractures [20]. Rapp and co-workers analyzed 31 children with femoral shaft fractures treated by ESINosteosynthesis: 4 needed an additional cast and 8 patients required reoperation. Indications were 4 varus deformities and 4 shortenings of the fracture (“telescoping”). In 3 cases these were caused by technical errors during implantation and 5 fractures which could not sufficiently stabilized owing to technical limitations of the method itself [12]. In conclusion, shortening, recurvation and varus seem to be the most important clinical problems associated with ESIN in femoral fractures. End caps were recommended to improve stability of the ESIN-osteosynthesis [21,22], but this could not be proved in our biomechanical in-vitro testing [23]. In the current study we aimed to analyze the effect of a 3rd ESIN on stiffness, which is a valid stability parameter in biomechanical testing [24,25]. Therefore in our spiral femur fracture model we compared osteosynthesis with 2C-shaped nails (2C) vs. 2C-shaped nails with the 3rd from antero-medial (3CM) and 2C-shaped nails with the 3rd from anterolateral (3CL), respectively. If an improvement in stiffness through one or both 3 nail configurations (3CM/3CL) occurred, these modifications would be evaluated in children with complex femur fractures. Methods Methods part A: biomechanical setting Biomechanical testing was performed using 24 synthetic composite left femoral models, 45 cm in length with a Page 2 of 10 central canal diameter of 10 mm (4th generation, Sawbones®, Vashon, Washington, USA; European department in Malmö, Sweden). The biomechanical in-vitro setting is described in detail elsewhere [23,26,27]. Each mid-shaft fracture was identically sawed by Sawbones® with a fracture length of 100 mm and an identical spiral fracture from distal lateral rotating to cranial medial (AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures: 32D51 [28]; LiLa classification for pediatric long-bone fractures: 3.2.s.3.2. [29]. Holes of 5 mm diameter were drilled 2–3 cm proximal of the virtual physis, medial and lateral at the distal femur, to serve as entry portals for the first two nails [4]. The entry point for the 3rd nail was 2.0 cm cranial ventral of the medial entry point in one configuration and ventral of the lateral in the other. Both nails of the 2C-shaped configuration were equally pre-bent to 40° [30]. The 3rd nail was inserted unbent afterwards. Retrograde intramedullary fixation was always performed by the same pediatric surgeon, specialized in pediatric traumatology. The 24 composite models were divided into three configuration groups: - For the “classical” configuration with 2C-shaped ESIN pattern two 3.5 mm titanium nails were used (Group 2C: n = 8). After crossing the fracture zone the nails ended in the proximal extreme of the canal, just inferior to the greater trochanter. Fluoroscopic imaging was carried out on each specimen to confirm the correct configuration and position of the nails. - In the modified versions with 3 nails a 2.5 mm 3rd nail was placed antero-medial (Group 3CM: n = 8) and anterolateral (Group 3CL: n = 8, Figures 1 and 2), respectively. A Zwick 1465 universal testing machine (UTM, Zwick GmbH & Co. KG Ulm, Germany) was used and the whole protocol was according to the ASTM F383-73 and F1264-03 standards. The femoral head and condyles were fixed in the test rig using custom-fit polymethylmethacrylate (Technovit 4006, Heraeus Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany). The testing of the specimens followed the standardized sequence: first 4-point bending tests [anterior–posterior (AP), posterior–anterior (PA), lateral–medial (LM) and medial–lateral (ML)], then torsion tests [internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) (Figure 3)] followed by axial compression tests in the 0° (0°) and in the physiological 9° position (9°) of the femur. The 4-point bending was determined using an incremental linear encoder (Product ID: MS30-1-LD-2, Megatron, Putzbrunn, Germany). Bending was at the midpoint of the two lower force bars with a maximum bending moment of 5 Nm and a speed of 0.05 mm/s; the maximum bend allowed was 2 mm to avoid any destruction. The torsion tests were undertaken with two angular encoders at an angular speed of 20°/min; torsion was limited to 10°. For the Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 Page 3 of 10 Figure 1 Radiograph (anterior-posterior view) of a 3CL femoral model with retrograde intramedullary nailing, showing two 3.5 mm titanium nails implanted in 2C shaped configuration and one additional 2.5 mm titanium nail implanted antero-lateral. compression tests the femur was first positioned in the 0° position, then in the physiological 9° position of the femur with a calibrated wedge. In physiological 9° compression, the shifting at the trochanter major was analyzed corresponding to varus and valgus deformity as well the shifting at the crista intertrochanterica corresponding to ante- and recurvation. A compressive load of up to 150 N (0°) and 100 N (9°) was applied to the femoral head at a speed of 0.05 mm/s. As before, two incremental linear encoders measured the reduction of the fracture gap in the 0° and 9° positions. The first standardized cycle was used as preconditioning; the data of the following three cycles were collected for analysis. To detect possible destructive changes to the specimens during the loading, an additional anteriorposterior stress was applied after the last individual test in the 9° position. Statistics for biomechanical testing Biomechanical data (bending moments in 4-point bending, torsion stiffness in IR/ER and shortening in 0°/9°position) were analyzed. Distributions were checked for normality (Shapiro-Wilk-Test). When a significant deviation from a normal distribution occurred, the Mann– Whitney-Test was performed. The F-Test and analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used if the distributions were Figure 2 Radiograph (lateral view) of a 3CL femoral model with retrograde intramedullary nailing, showing two 3.5 mm titanium nails implanted in 2C shaped configuration and one additional 2.5 mm titanium nail implanted antero-lateral. normal. All values are presented as mean values. The Holm-Bonferroni correction was applied in view of the multiple series of data. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Methods part B: clinical setting/transfer into clinical evaluation As the analysis of the biomechanical testing showed a higher stability for the 3CL configuration in two (anterior-posterior corresponding to recurvation and 9° compression to shortening/see results) of three directions associated with the most important clinical problems, we transferred this modification into clinical practice. By study protocol, first feasibility should be proved in 5 children with a either a complex/comminuted femur fracture or who weighed more than 40 kg. All 5 operations were carried out by the same pediatric surgeon, specialized in pediatric traumatology, from March 2007 onwards. After considering this modification feasible, the modified regime was carried out by other members of the staff, with the 3rd nail being placed either from antero-lateral or antero-medial (Figure 4a-c; Figures 5 and 6) depending on the individual fracture type: having created a classical 2-C-shaped ESIN-osteosynthesis the fracture was checked Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 Page 4 of 10 Figure 3 Torsional testing of a Sawbone® with a spiral fracture. The torsion tests were undertaken with two angular encoders at an angular speed of 20°/min; torsion was limited to 10°. for remaining instability and its tendency towards valgus (“3CM” to provide more intramedullary pressure from medial to lateral) or varus malalignment (“3CL”). The diameters of the nails were chosen based on the size of the medullar canal as revealed by X-ray. The diameters of the first 2 nails were always the same; that of the 3rd nail was chosen by reference to the configuration of the fractured bone and thus varied. Gender, age and co-morbidity of the children, nail diameter, duration of surgery, additional stabilization, re-operations, time to full weight bearing and postoperative axial deviation were all documented. Follow-up occurred after 1, 3 and 6 months then every 6 months. Limb length discrepancy, re-fractures, misalignment, range of motion and limitations in daily living were documented through clinical examination and analyzed by the modified Harris-Score [12]. Radiological examination was performed 1 day after the primary operation, and then routinely after 1 month and 3 months. If consolidation was not complete, a third X-ray was determined individually for planning implant removal. All patients and their families gave written Informed Consent to participate in the study. The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Luebeck [08–069]. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01673048. Results Results A: biomechanical testing All the biomechanical results for the stiffness and the gap change during compression of the different configurations are shown in Tables 1, 2, 3. Overall, the modified 3 ESIN configurations (3CM/3CL) showed good alignment. No systematic difference in stiffness was found between 2C and 3CM (Table 1). 3CL revealed a significantly higher stiffness than 2C in the anterior-posterior directions, internal rotation and also in the 9° compression, in which smaller change in length indicates higher stability (Table 2). Likewise, 3CL showed a significant higher stiffness than 3CM in the same directions: anterior-posterior, internal rotation and 9° compression and further in lateral-medial (Table 3). However, 3CL was less stable in the posterior-anterior and external rotation than 2C (Table 2) and 3CM (Table 3). 0° axial compression was not influenced by either modification. Results B: clinical results We intended to treat 18 children by these 3CM or 3CL modifications (Table 4), which was possible in 16 children (10 boys, 6 girls; aged 3 to 13 years). 12 configurations were ‘3CL’ (Figure 4a-c) and 4 ‘3CM’ (Figures 5 and 6) according to the individual character of the fracture. In two patients 3CL and 3CM did not provide enough stability: Because of a contralateral tibia fracture with compartment syndrome, the femur fracture of a 15-year-old boy was fixed with four nails as this gave him the possibility of very early mobilization (No. 7). In a 3-year-old boy none of the ESIN- osteosynthesis achieved sufficient stability (No. 18). As the aim of the operation was an internal osteosynthesis an angle-stable plate osteosynthesis was performed as an exception. The overall duration of surgery was 45 to 120 minutes (including all soft tissue repairs and additional procedures especially in polytrauma-patients), of which 8 to 20 minutes were for the implantation of the 3rd nail. Twice an open reduction was necessary. None of the fractures required additional stabilization. Postoperative femoral antecurvation varied between 0 and 12° (mean 2.3°); varus deformity ranged from 0 to 12° (mean 1°) and valgus from 0 to 7° (mean 1°). There was no case of recurvation or “telescoping” of a fracture. In one child Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 Page 5 of 10 Table 1 Comparison between stiffness of osteosynthesis with 2C-shaped nails “2C“ (Titanium Nails, Santech Nord® Company) and 2C-shaped nails with 3rd from antero-medial “3CM” (Titanium Nails, Santech Nord® Company) 2C-shaped nails “2C“ (n = 8) 3C-shaped nails with 3rd from antero-medial “3CM” (n = 8) Mean value (SD) Mean value (SD) p value No statistical significant difference Anterior-posterior 0.78 (0.29) N m/mm ~ 0.66 (0.32) N m/mm n.s. Posterior-anterior 1.78 (1.31) N m/mm ~ 2.87 (2.01) N m/mm n.s. Lateral-medial 0.86 (0.33) N m/mm ~ 0.71 (0.23) N m/mm n.s. Medial-lateral 1.10 (0.40) N m/mm ~ 1.09 (0.47) N m/mm n.s. External rotation 0.32 (0.18) N m/° ~ 0.30 (0.13) N m/° n.s. Internal rotation 0.14 (0.04) N m/° ~ 0.14 (0.03) N m/° n.s. Compression 0° (decrease in length) 0.02 (0.03) mm ~ 0.02 (0.01) mm n.s. Compression 9° (decrease in length) 2.18 (2.37) mm ~ 1.54 (1.24) mm n.s. Smaller length changes in compression tests reflect a higher stability. Special terms for biomechanical directions corresponding to the most important clinical problems in elastic stable intramedullary nailing of complex fractures: shortening (= compression 9°), recurvation (= anterior-posterior) and varus (= medial-lateral) as the most important clinical problems in elastic stable intramedullary nailing of complex fractures. the ends of the nails were left too long: skin irritation prompted their removal after 4 months without further sequelae (No. 8). In another patient the tip of the nail perforated the corticalis proximal without further consequences (No. 12). No early or late reoperations due to the femur fractures occurred in any of patients. Mobilization and full weight bearing was achieved after 6 weeks at the latest. Following implant removal after complete healing of the fractures (3–8 months after accident, mean 5 months), all patients reached the maximum Harris Score of 100 points. There were no problems after implant removal. At later follow-up (1–4 years) no limb length discrepancy occurred in any of the patients. Discussion Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for displaced pediatric femoral fractures has become the treatment of choice for children [1]. Nevertheless complications of the ESIN-osteosynthesis occur due to technical errors during application and limitations of the method itself [12-17,30-32]. As a conclusion of literature and own data, most frequent postoperative complications seem to be shortening (“telescoping”), recurvation and varus deformation resulting in postoperative misalignment, re-do operations and the additional application of a cast or external fixation [33,34]. As standardized biomechanical studies are known to be an important precursor to clinical studies, we were sure that further experiments in Table 2 Comparison between stiffness of osteosynthesis with 2C-shaped nails “2C“ (Titanium Nails, Santech Nord® Company) and 2C-shaped nails with 3rd from antero-lateral “3CL” (Titanium Nails, Santech Nord ® Company) 2C-shaped nails “2C“ (n = 8) 3C-shaped nails with 3rd from antero-lateral “3CL” (n = 8) Mean value (SD) Mean value (SD) p value 3CL more stable than 2C Anterior-posterior 0.78 (0.29) N m/mm < 1.23 (0.62) N m/mm 0.007 Internal rotation 0.14 (0.04) N m/° < 0.21 (0.07) N m/° <0.001 Compression 9° (decrease in length) 2.18 (2.37) mm > 0.61 (0.43) mm 0.023 Posterior-anterior 1.78 (1.31) N m/mm > 1.03 (0.97) N m/mm 0.014 External rotation 0.32 (0.18) N m/° > 0.19 (0.12) N m/° 0.004 0.02 (0.03) mm ~ 0.03 (0.03) mm n.s. 3CL less stable than 2C No statistical significant difference Compression 0° (decrease in length) Lateral-medial 0.86 (0.33) N m/mm ~ 0.88 (0.30) N m/mm n.s. Medial - lateral 1.10 (0.40) N m/mm ~ 1.10 (0.53) N m/mm n.s. The Holm-Bonferroni correction was applied in view of the multiple series of data. Smaller length changes in compression tests reflect a higher stability. Special terms for biomechanical directions corresponding to the most important clinical problems in elastic stable intramedullary nailing of complex fractures: shortening (= compression 9°), recurvation (= anterior-posterior) and varus (= medial-lateral) as the most important clinical problems in elastic stable intramedullary nailing of complex fractures. Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 Page 6 of 10 Table 3 Comparison between stiffness of osteosynthesis with 2C-shaped nails with the 3rd from antero-lateral “3CL” (Titanium Nails, Santech Nord® Company) and 2C-shaped nails with the 3rd from antero-medial “3CM” (Titanium Nails, Santech Nord® Company) 3C-shaped nails with 3rd from antero-lateral “3CL” (n = 8) 3C-shaped nails with 3rd from antero-medial “3CM” (n = 8) Mean value (SD) Mean value (SD) p value 3CL more stable than 3CM Anterior-posterior 1.23 (0.62) N m/mm > 0.66 (0.32) N m/mm <0.001 Lateral-medial 0.88 (0.30) N m/mm > 0.71 (0.23) N m/mm 0.028 Internal rotation 0.21 (0.07) N m/° > 0.14 (0.03) N m/° <0.001 Compression 9° (decrease in length) 0.61 (0.43) mm < 1.54 (1.24) mm 0.004 Posterior-anterior 1.03 (0.97) N m/mm < 2.87 (2.01) N m/mm 0.001 External rotation 0.19 (0.12) Nm/° < 0.30 (0.13) N m/° 0.003 3CL less stable than 3CM No statistical significant difference Compression 0° (decrease in length) 0.03 (0.03) mm ~ 0.02 (0.01) mm n.s Medial - lateral 1.10 (0.53) N m/mm ~ 1.09 (0.47) N m/mm n.s The Holm-Bonferroni correction was applied in view of the multiple series of data. Smaller length changes in compression tests reflect a higher stability. Special terms for biomechanical directions corresponding to the most important clinical problems in elastic stable intramedullary nailing of complex fractures: shortening (= compression 9°), recurvation (= anterior-posterior) and varus (= medial-lateral) as the most important clinical problems in elastic stable intramedullary nailing of complex fractures. this area would increase our understanding of ESINosteosynthesis. Thus, an adolescent-sized femur model with a standardized spiral fracture was used, because the primary targets were complex fractures in older children or weighing more than 40 kg. Because of the complexity of long spiral fractures, testing of all relevant variables was performed: 4-point bending (corresponding to deformation forces as antecurvation, recurvation, valgus and varus), external and internal rotation as well as axial 0° and physiological 9° compression (corresponding to shortening or “telescoping”). Few reports of further biomechanical testing of the ESIN-osteosynthesis could be found; most of these where not standardized, depicted a small number of cases [35,36], evaluated only a few selected planes [35,37,38] or studied exclusively transverse and oblique fractures [36]. Benz and co-workers investigated changes of stability during 4-point-bending and torsion, but they only achieved sufficient 2-nail flexible intramedullary fixation for testing in 3 out of 10 canine bones [39]. Through our biomechanical model we compared the “classical” 2C configuration (2C-shaped 3.5 mm titanium nails) with 2 modified versions, each with an additional 2.5 mm titanium nail placed either from antero-medial (3CM) or antero-lateral (3CL). All the specimens with 3 ESIN achieved a better alignment and macroscopic stiffness of the fracture. In our specific spiral fracture type with rotation from distal lateral to cranial medial, the 3rd nail from anterior-lateral was effective in reducing 2 of the 3 causes of poor clinical outcomes mentioned above: the danger of shortening (better results in 9° compression) and recurvation (better results in anterior-posterior). That position of the 3rd intramedullary nail provided more stability for this specific type of the fracture which also might explain why contradictory results occurred in posterioranterior versus anterior-posterior and internal versus external rotation. The further clinical problem, the valgus deviation, was not influenced by either modified configuration. Nevertheless variations in the course of the 3rd nail might influence this system: If the planes between the 3rd nail and each of the other 2 were almost parallel, the increase in stability would barely be noticeable. On the other hand, positioning the 3rd nail in an almost equilateral triangle with the first 2 nails could result in significantly increased stability. Further CT-imaging studies with our 3 nail specimen will test this hypothesis. A limitation of this first biomechanical study on the use of 3 nails is that a synthetic bone model was used, which cannot precisely reproduce all in-vivo conditions. However, because of the high repeatability due to minimal inter-individual variability [40-42], it was used successfully in previous biomechanical studies [23,26,27]. Furthermore, due to the configuration of the synthetic bone model, the nails could not be placed as proximally as is ideal in real operations. On the other hand, the planned configuration of the nails can be achieved more precisely in an experimental setup with an identical surgical technique, an exact pre-bending and an even introduction of the nails, than in a real surgical situation. In spite of these limitations of the biomechanical study, our results were transferred successfully to a clinical setting. Osteosynthesis with 3 nails was first performed by No by Sex random Age Type of fracture Location in diaphysis AO-Ped-* LiLa-* Size of the nails 3C Lateral/ medial Reduction Co-morbidity Complication Implant Axis ° (X-ray post-OP) classification classification (mm) removal (months) AP/PA LM/ML 1 Female 11 Oblique + wedge Central 32D52 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 4.0 + 1 × 4.0 Lateral Closed No 5 0° 0° 2 Female 8 Comminuted Proximal 32D53 3.2.s.4.2 2 × 3.0 + 1 × 2.0 Lateral Closed No 6 3° Ante 0° 3 Male 12 Oblique + wedge Central 32D52 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 3.5 + 1 × 3.0 Lateral Closed No 3 8° Ante 12° Varus 4 Male 12 Oblique Distal 5 Female 11 6 Male 7 Male 8 9 32D51 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 4.0 + 1 × 3.0 Medial Closed Comminuted, 2° open Central 32D43 3.2.s.4.2 2 × 3.5 + 1 × 3.0 Lateral Closed Polytrauma 9 Transverse, 2° open Central 32D41 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 3.5 + 1 × 3.0 Lateral Closed Decollement No 5 0° 0° 15 Transverse, 2° open Central 32D42 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 4.0 + 2 × 4.0 Medial + Lateral Closed ContraLateral tibia fracture No 8 0° 3° Male 13 Transverse Distal-metaphysis 32D41 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 3.5 + 1 × 4.0 Lateral Closed Skin irritation 4 0° 2° Male 3 Long spiral Central 32D51 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 2.5 + 1 × 2.5 Lateral Closed No 3 0° 0° 10 Male 6 Long spiral Central 32D51 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 3.5 + 1 × 3.0 Lateral Closed No 5 0° 3° 11 Male 13 Transverse Central 32D41 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 3.5 + 1 × 3.5 Medial Open no 8 0° 3° 12 Female 3 Long spiral Central 32D51 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 2.5 + 1 × 2.5 Lateral Closed Perforation of a nail-tip 2 0° 0° 13 Male Long spiral Central 32D51 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 2.5 + 1 × 2.5 Medial Closed No 4 0° 7° Valgus 14 Female 6 Spiral Central 32D51 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 2.5 + 1 × 2.5 Medial Closed No 4 0° 0° 15 Female 8 Oblique + wedge Central 32D52 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 3.0 + 1 × 2.5 Lateral Closed No 4 5° Ante 0° 16 Male 8 Transverse Central 32D41 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 3.0 + 1 × 3.0 Lateral Open No 6 12° Ante 0° 17 Male 3 Long spiral Central 32D51 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 2.5 + 1 × 2.5 Lateral Closed No 3 2° Ante 0° 18 Male 3 Long spiral Central 32D51 3.2.s.3.2 2 × 2.5 + 1 × 2.5 Not possible Open Plate 3 osteosynthesis 0° 0° 2.5 Polytrauma No 4 0° 0° No 6 8° Ante 0° Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 Table 4 Data of 18 patients in whom an osteosynthesis with 3 elastic stable nails “3CM” or “3CL” was attempted *AO-Ped Classification = AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures [20]. *LiLa Classification = LiLa classification for pediatric long-bone fractures [21]. Ante = Antecurvation, AP = anterior-posterior, PA = posterior-anterior, LM = latermal-medial, ML = medial-Lateral. Page 7 of 10 Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 Page 8 of 10 Figure 4 Radiographs of a left femur with a complex proximal spiroid fracture of the shaft. a: Fracture; b: X-Rays a-p and lateral after 1 month, c: X-Rays a-p and lateral after 4 months. a pediatric surgeon, specialized in pediatric traumatology (MMK) and then transferred to other members of the pediatric surgery department. Although the 3CLconfiguration was initially preferred, the position of the 3rd nail was later chosen in accordance with the plane which was assumed to be the least stable. No clinically relevant deviation of axis or shortening was documented in osteosynthesis with 3 nails in 16 patients. None of the fractures required additional stabilization or re-operation. In 2 patients the 3 ESIN-osteosynthesis did not gain enough stability: Because of a contra lateral fracture of the tibia, a Figure 5 Radiograph (anterior-posterior view) of a 3CM configuration, 4 months postoperativly, diameter of the nails: 3 × 3.5 mm. modification with 4 nails was chosen to reach early mobilization with weight bearing (No. 7) and in one long spiral fracture an angle-stable osteosynthesis had to be performed (No. 18). All patients reached the maximum Harris score of 100 points in the follow-up evaluations. This transfer of biomechanical results into clinical practice demonstrates the following: a) a 3rd nail, additionally implanted to a technically perfect 2C-ESIN configuration, can increase the stability of the fixation in a femoral fracture, Figure 6 Radiograph (lateral view) of a 3CM configuration, 4 months postoperativly, diameter of the nails: 3 × 3.5 mm. Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 b) the implantation and the pre-bending of the 3rd nail must be appropriate to the individual character of the fracture and c) despite these very good results with the 3CL or 3CM configurations not all problems can be solved with these modifications. In essence, the fixation of complex femur fractures remains technically demanding and this comparison shows the high relevance of pre-clinical experimental studies. A high success rate can be achieved using insights gained from in-vitro studies, thus preventing children and adolescents from undergoing unnecessary clinical trials. We can recommend the use of a 3 ESIN-osteosynthesis in pediatric femur fractures, as long as the biomechanical characteristics of the fracture type are taken into account in the placement of the 3rd nail. Conclusion In this biomechanical model the 3rd nail from anterolateral ‘3CL’ was effective in reducing two of the three causes of poor clinical outcomes in ESIN-osteosynthesis: the danger of shortening (significantly higher stiffness in 9° compression) and recurvation (significantly higher stiffness in anterior-posterior bending). These in-vitro results were successfully transmitted into clinical practice and adapted (3rd nail from antero-lateral or -medial) to the individual character of each femur shaft fracture. Through the successful transmission of our biomechanical results into a clinical setting we are able to recommend the use of a 3rd nail in ESIN in pediatric femur fractures to improve the stability of the osteosynthesis and to reduce peri- and postoperative complications. As a consequence, at our hospital all femoral diaphyseal fractures in children/adolescents with open physis are treated with this modified ESIN-technique. However, a perfect technique while implanting the first two nails is always necessary. Competing interest All authors declare that no benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. There is no conflict of interest for any author. The elastic stable nails were sponsored by Santech Nord Company, Schneverdingen, Germany. Authors’ contributions CS wrote the manuscript and did the biomechanical testing with support of RE, MSH, NG, GZ was responsible for all testing in the laboratory and edited the manuscript. MR organizes the research group and was responsible for the follow-up of the patients and for translation and proof-reading of all versions of the manuscript. MMK did most of the operations on the patients, revised the manuscript and all revisions, is the responsible author and the head of the study group. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Author details 1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratezburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Page 9 of 10 Germany. 2Department of Paediatric Surgery, Hospital of Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41-43, 34125 Kassel, Germany. 3Department of Biomechatronics and Academic Orthopedics, University of Luebeck, Ratezburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany. Received: 22 November 2012 Accepted: 31 December 2013 Published: 8 January 2014 References 1. Leitlinien AF: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderchirurgie; 2008. http://www. awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/006-016.html. 2. Beaty JH, Austin SM, Warner WC, Canale ST, Nichols L: Interlocking intramedullary nailing of femoral-shaft fractures in adolescents: preliminary results and complications. J Pediatr Orthop 1994, 14(2):178–183. 3. Dietz HG, Joppich I, Marzi I, Parsch K, Schlickewei W, Schmittenbecher PP: [Treatment of femoral fractures in childhood. Consensus report of the 19th meeting of the child traumatology section of the DGU, Munich, 23–24 June 2000]. Unfallchirurg 2001, 104(8):788–790. 4. Dietz HG, Schmittenbecher PP, Illing P: Intramedulläre Osteosynthese im Wachstumsalter. München Wien Baltimore: Urban + Schwarzenberg; 1997. 5. Metaizeau JP: Stable elastic intramedullary nailing for fractures of the femur in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86(7):954–957. 6. Frank DA, Gallo RA, Altman GT, Altman DT: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head after retrograde intramedullary nailing of a femoral shaft fracture in an adolescent. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg 2005, 87(9):2080–2085. 7. Gordon JE, Swenning TA, Burd TA, Szymanski DA, Schoenecker PL: Proximal femoral radiographic changes after lateral transtrochanteric intramedullary nail placement in children. J Bone Joint Surg 2003, 85-A(7):1295–1301. 8. Beaty JH, Kasser JR: Rockwood and Wilkins’Fractures in Children. 6th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia; 2006. 9. Anastasopoulos J, Petratos D, Konstantoulakis C, Plakogiannis C, Matsinos G: Flexible intramedullary nailing in paediatric femoral shaft fractures. Injury 2010, 41:578–582. 10. Maier M, Marzi I: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of femur fractures in children. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2008, 20(4-5):364–72. 11. Synthes: The titanium elastic nail system TECHNIQUE GUIDE. 1998. http:// www.rcsed.ac.uk/fellows/lvanrensburg/classification/surgtech/ao/manuals/ Synthes%20TENS%20nails.pdf. 12. Rapp M, Albers K, Kaiser MM: Korrektureingriffe nach Operationen bei Femurschaftfrakturen im Kindesalter. Chirurgische Praxis 2011, 73/3:499–512. 13. Luhmann SJ, Schootman M, Schoenecker PL, Dobbs MB, Gordon JE: Complications of titanium elastic nails for pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2003, 23(4):443–447. 14. Narayanan UG, Hyman JE, Wainwright AM, Rang M, Alman BA: Complications of elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures, and how to avoid them. J Pediatr Orthop 2004, 24(4):363–369. 15. Slongo TF: Complications and failures of the ESIN technique. Injury 2005, 36(Suppl 1):A78–A85. 16. Wall EJ, Jain V, Vora V, Mehlman CT, Crawford AH: Complications of titanium and stainless steel elastic nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 2008, 90(6):1305–1313. 17. Flynn JM, Hresko T, Reynolds RA, Blasier RD, Davidson R, Kasser J: Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: a multicenter study of early results with analysis of complications. J Pediatr Orthop 2001, 21(1):4–8. 18. Kuremsky MA, Frick SL: Advances in the surgical management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. Curr Opin Pediatr 2007, 19(1):51–57. 19. Sink EL, Hedequist D, Morgan SJ, Hresko T: Results and technique of unstable pediatric femoral fractures treated with submuscular bridge plating. J Pediatr Orthop 2006, 26(2):177–181. 20. von Laer L, Kraus R, Linhardt W: Frakturen und Luxationen im Wachstumsalter. New York: G Thieme Verlag Stuttgart; 2007. 21. Volpon JB, Perina MM, Okubo R, Maranho DA: Biomechanical performance of flexible intramedullary nails with end caps tested in distal segmental defects of pediatric femur models. J Pediatr Orthop 2012, 32(5):461–6. 22. Nectoux E, Giacomelli MC, Karger C, Gicquel P, Clavert JM: Use of end caps in elastic stable intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial unstable fractures in children: preliminary results in 11 fractures. J Child Orthop 2008, 2(4):309–314. 23. Kaiser MM, Zachert G, Wendlandt R, Rapp M, Eggert C, Stratmann C, Wessel LM, Schulz AP, Kienast B: Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femoral spiral fracture model: Do End caps improve retrograde flexible intramedullary nail fixation? J Orthop Surg Res 2011, 6:46. Kaiser et al. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014, 15:3 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/15/3 24. Tschegg EK, Herndler S, Weninger P, Jamek M, Stanzl-Tschegg S, Redl H: Stiffness analysis of tibia-implant system under cyclic loading. Mater Sci Eng 2008, C28:1203–1208. 25. Tschegg EK, Lindtner RA, Doblhoff-Dier V, Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Holzlechner G, Castellani C, Imwinkelried T, Weinberg A: Characterization methods of bone-implant-interfaces of bioresorbable and titanium implants by fracture mechanical means. J Mech Behav Biomed Mat 2010, 4(5):766–775. 26. Kaiser MM, Wessel LM, Zachert G, Stratmann C, Eggert R, Gros N, SchulzeHessing M, Kienast B, Rapp M: Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femur spiral fracture model: influence of different materials on the stiffness in flexible intramedullary nailing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011, 26(6):592–597. 27. Kaiser MM, Zachert G, Wendlandt R, Eggert R, Stratmann C, Gros N, SchulzeHessing M, Rapp M: Increasing stability by pre-bending the nails in elastic stable intramedullary nailing: a biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femoral spiral fracture model. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(5):713–718. 28. Slongo T, Audige L, Clavert JM, Lutz N, Frick S, Hunter J: The AO comprehensive classification of pediatric long-bone fractures: a webbased multicenter agreement study. J Pediatr Orthop 2007, 27(2):171–180. 29. Kamphaus A, Rapp M, Wessel LM, Buchholz M, Massalme E, Schneidmuller D, Roeder C, Kaiser MM: [LiLa classification for paediatric long bone fractures: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Unfallchirurg 2013 [Epud ahead of print]. 30. Lascombes P, Haumont T, Journeau P: Use and abuse of flexible intramedullary nailing in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 2006, 26(6):827–834. 31. Jubel A, Andermahr J, Prokop A, Bergmann H, Isenberg J, Rehm KE: Pitfalls and complications of elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of femoral fractures in infancy. Unfallchirurg 2004, 107(9):744–749. 32. Moroz LA, Launay F, Kocher MS, Newton PO, Frick SL, Sponseller PD, Flynn JM: Titanium elastic nailing of fractures of the femur in children. Predictors of complications and poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88(10):1361–1366. 33. Kaiser MM, Albers K, Wessel LM: Technical problems and complications with ESIN-Osteosynthesis of the lower extremitites. Abstractband Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2008, 34(2):207. 34. Oh CW, Park BC, Kim PT, Kyung HS, Kim SJ, Ihn JC: Retrograde flexible intramedullary nailing in children’s femoral fractures. Int Orthop 2002, 26(1):52–55. 35. Fricka KB, Mahar AT, Lee SS, Newton PO: Biomechanical analysis of antegrade and retrograde flexible intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures using a synthetic bone model. J Pediatr Orthop 2004, 24(2):167–171. 36. Mehlman CT, Nemeth NM, Glos DL: Antegrade versus retrograde titanium elastic nail fixation of pediatric distal-third femoral-shaft fractures: a mechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 2006, 20(9):608–612. 37. Crist BD, Dart BR, Czuwala PJ, Olney BW, Pence CD: Using flexible nails to improve stabilization of proximal femur fractures in adolescents. Am J Orthop 2006, 35(1):37–41. 38. Gwyn DT, Olney BW, Dart BR, Czuwala PJ: Rotational control of various pediatric femur fractures stabilized with titanium elastic intramedullary nails. J Pediatr Orthop 2004, 24(2):172–177. 39. Benz G, Kallieris S, Blume U: Biomechanik des experimentell gesetzten Biege- und Torsionsbruchs vor und nach Versorgung mit Nancy-Nägeln. Zentralbl Kinderchir 2000, 9:104–109. 40. Chong AC, Friis EA, Ballard GP, Czuwala PJ, Cooke FW: Fatigue performance of composite analogue femur constructs under high activity loading. Ann Biomed Eng 2007, 35(7):1196–1205. 41. Chong AC, Miller F, Buxton M, Friis EA: Fracture toughness and fatigue crack propagation rate of short fiber reinforced epoxy composites for analogue cortical bone. J Biomech Eng 2007, 129(4):487–493. 42. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A: Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomech 1996, 29(4):525–535. Page 10 of 10 Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: • Convenient online submission doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-3 Cite this article as: Kaiser et al.: Modification of elastic stable intramedullary nailing with a 3rd nail in a femoral spiral fracture model – results of biomechanical testing and a prospective clinical study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2014 15:3. • Thorough peer review • No space constraints or color figure charges • Immediate publication on acceptance • Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar • Research which is freely available for redistribution Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit