Effect of multinutrient (N, P, K and Zn) briquettes on growth and yield of Bt cotton

pdf
Số trang Effect of multinutrient (N, P, K and Zn) briquettes on growth and yield of Bt cotton 7 Cỡ tệp Effect of multinutrient (N, P, K and Zn) briquettes on growth and yield of Bt cotton 218 KB Lượt tải Effect of multinutrient (N, P, K and Zn) briquettes on growth and yield of Bt cotton 0 Lượt đọc Effect of multinutrient (N, P, K and Zn) briquettes on growth and yield of Bt cotton 1
Đánh giá Effect of multinutrient (N, P, K and Zn) briquettes on growth and yield of Bt cotton
4.8 ( 20 lượt)
Nhấn vào bên dưới để tải tài liệu
Để tải xuống xem đầy đủ hãy nhấn vào bên trên
Chủ đề liên quan

Nội dung

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11): 717-723 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 11 (2017) pp. 717-723 Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.084 Effect of Multinutrient (N, P, K and Zn) Briquettes on Growth and Yield of Bt Cotton B.H. Sunil1*, V.D. Patil2, M. Pushpalatha3 and V.M. Basavaprasad4 1 2 Department of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, Parbhani, India Director of Instruction and Dean, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani 431402, (M.S.), India 3 Department of Soil Science and Agriculture chemistry, Latur, India 4 Department of Soil Science and Agriculture chemistry, Badnapur, India *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Keywords Multinutrient (N, P, K and Zn) briquettes, Bt cotton, Yield. Article Info Accepted: 07 September 2017 Available Online: 10 November 2017 An experiment was conducted at experimental farm of Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani during kharif season, 2015-16. The effect of multinutrient briquettes was studied on growth, yield and yield attributing character of Bt cotton. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with five treatments and four replications. The results of the investigation revealed that height of Bt cotton plant at square formation, flowering, boll bursting and harvest was continuously increasing in all the treatments. Maximum increase in height was observed with the treatment receiving RDF through a fertigation in six splits followed by multi nutrient NPK+ Zn briquette application. The maximum number of leaves was observed with treatment RDF through a fertigation at square formation, flowering, boll bursting and at last picking and next best treatment was application of NPK+ Zn through briquette. The highest dry matter was recorded with RDF through a fertigation and NPK + Zn briquette application at last picking and there was almost two fold increase in dry matter from boll formation to last picking whereas the maximum number of bolls was recorded in treatment RDF applied in six splits through soluble fertilizers by fertigation. The application of 80:40:40 kg NPK kg ha-1 through soluble fertilizers by fertigation in six splits have produced more seed cotton yield which was at par with application of 120:60:60 N, P2O5 and K2O through briquettes. Besides, the addition of 20 kg ZnSO 4 in NPK briquette proved its superiority over all treatment except fertigation. Introduction Generally, farmers of the country nearly 15 million spread across 10 states are engaged in cotton production. It is grown on an area of 11.76 million hectares. This area of 11.76 million hectares constitutes around 38% of the world area under cotton cultivation. Several reports studies indicated that positive correlation between vegetative growth and the number of fruiting points produced by cotton is well known. N supplement therefore by split application becomes important as it is supplied ideally in a time when crop critically requires. Bt-cotton differs in its requirement either by total or part of it in the different stages of crop. Thus, nitrogen use efficiency can be increased and better used to attain the 717 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11): 717-723 objective of higher production (Hallikari et al., 2010). Phosphorus is another important nutrient in cotton production. It is essential for vigorous root and shoot growth, promotes early boll development, hastens maturity, helps to overcome the effects of compaction, increases water use efficiency, and is necessary for energy storage and transfer in plants. The function of potassium in plant metabolism is different from that of other major nutrients. The later become part of the plant structure, whereas potassium largely remains as an ion in the cells and sap and helps to control the water intake and metabolism of the plant. the mean sea level. The mean temperature ranges from 20.9 (minimum) to 34.2ºC (maximum) and relative humidity was 79.0 per cent throughout the wet seasons. The experimental soil belongs to taxonomic class Parbhani series of mixed montmorillonite hyperthermic Typic haplusterts. The soils were analyzed by following standard analytical procedure as outlined by Jackson (1973). The soil pH was 7.73; EC 046 dSm-1, available nitrogen 140 kg ha-1, available phosphorus 8.5 kg ha-1 and available potassium 699.26 kg ha-1and available zinc 0.53 mg kg-1. Bt cotton were grown on field at a spacing of 180 x 30cm2 with the gross plot size 7.2x5.4cm2. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design comprising of five treatments with four replications. Patil et al., (2001) reported that the soil potassium reserves are depleted and crop yields found to be reduced. It is reported that high clay Vertisol once upon a time suppose to be having very high potassium content now responding for K application, which shows that the K content has been depleted. On the other hand, zinc is one of the plant micronutrients, involved in many enzymatic activities of plants. It functions generally as a metal activator of enzymes. Patil (2013) reported that zinc improves crop productivity almost as much as major nutrients do. It ranks the third most important limiting nutrient element, next to nitrogen and phosphorus in crop production. Besides increasing crop yield it increases the crude protein content, amino acids, energy value and total lipid in chickpea, soybean, black gram etc. with zinc application. Treatment details T1: Absolute Control (No fertilizer application) T2: Soil application of 120:60:60 by N, P2O5, K2O kg ha-1 and Drip irrigation T3: RDF through fertigation (soluble fertilizer: 80:40:40 NPK kg ha -1) T4: 120: 60: 60 kg NPK ha-1 through briquettes with drip irrigation T5: Application of NPK + micronutrient briquettes (120:60: 60 NPK kg ha -1 +20kg ha1 ZnSO4) these are applied in three split dose, 24 N, 36 P2O5, 36 K2O and 10 Zn kg ha-1 at basal dose, 48 N, 24 P2O5, 24 K2O and 10 Zn kg ha-1 at square formation and 48 N at flower formation stage. Materials and Methods A field experiment was conducted at the Research Farm of Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani during 201516.The location of experiment lies between 76046’, east longitude and 19016’ North latitude, having elevation of 423.46 m above Results and Discussion Growth and yield attributes The plant height of Bt Cotton increased gradually within the treatments of various 718 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11): 717-723 stages of crop i.e. 21.80 to 35.50 cm at 30 DAS, 58.10 to 70.0 cm at 60 DAS, 65.28 to 85.51cm at 90 DAS and 84.05 to 101.50 cm at last picking stage. Application of soluble fertilizers through fertigation (T3) found better amongst all treatments in improving the height of cotton. Fertigation treatments recorded significantly higher plant height at all growing stages of cotton as compared to briquettes application. The next best treatment was application of fertilizer through NPKZn briquette. Similar findings were also reported by Wadtkar et al., (2001), Raskar et al., (2001), Patke et al., (2003), Veerputhirum et al., (2005), Reddy and Aruna (2010), Mussaddak et al., (2011) and Tekale (2000) (Table 1). were increased from 52.55 to 75.50 and 79.35 to 97.10 and respectively due to application of recommended dose of soluble fertilizer through fertigation over soil application. Last picking stages it was observed that number of leaves increased from 84.25 to 143.65 and 130.50 due to fertigation and NPK+Zn briquette application. The maximum number of leaves was recorded with T3 (RDF fertilizer through fertigation) followed by multinutrient briquette over conventional fertilizer application and control at all growth stages. These results resembled with the results that were reported by Mussaddak et al., (2001), Patke et al., (2003). In depth scrutiny of data revealed that the dry matter (stalk) yield of Bt cotton at boll formation and at harvest varied from 84.45 to 120.09 and 297.40 to 409.48 g plant-1, respectively due to application of soluble fertilizers through drip irrigation i.e. fertigation, which showed distinct superiority, followed by the briquette application proved superiority over conventional fertilizer application (T2) and control (T1). These findings are in accordance with Mussaddak (2001), Patke et al., (2003), Veerpurthiran et al., (2005) (Table 3). The number of leaves plant-1 was recorded from square formation (30 DAS) stage to last picking i.e. harvest of cotton crop. In grand mean number of leaves were varied from 31.18 to 123.48 leaves per plant, this clearly indicates that number of leaves goes on increasing as crop proceeds towards maturity (Table 2). At square formation (30 DAS) stage the number of leaves plant-1 in treatment T1 was 29.05 which were increased to 34.86,flowering (60 DAS) stage and boll formation stage (90 DAS) number of leaves T3: RDF through fertigation (soluble fertilizer: 80:40:40 NPK kg ha -1) Application N (Kgha-1) P (Kgha-1) K (Kgha-1) Sowing 12 8 8 20 DAS 16 8 8 40 DAS 16 8 8 60 DAS 12 8 8 80 DAS 12 8 8 100 DAS 12 80 40 40 T4: 120: 60: 60 kg NPK ha-1 through briquettes with drip irrigation N(Kgha-1) P(Kgha-1) K(Kgha-1) Application Basal application 24 36 36 Square formation 48 24 24 Boll formation 48 00 00 719 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11): 717-723 Table.1 Effects of treatments on plant height (cm) at various growth stages of Bt-cotton Treatments Treatment details Absolute Control(Drip irrigation) RDF(Soil) Soluble(fertigation) Fertilizers NPK Briquetes with Drip NPK + Zn Briquettes with Drip Grand mean S.Em (±) CD at 5% T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 30 DAS Plant height (cm) Boll 60 DAS formation Last picking 21.80 58.10 65.28 84.05 31.68 59.55 70.47 86.65 35.50 70.0 85.51 101.50 33.15 69.55 76.86 95.15 35.45 70.80 83.33 99.25 31.51 0.334 1.042 65.60 0.278 0.865 76.29 0.223 0.696 93.32 0.563 1.754 Table.2 Effects of treatments on number of leaves at various growth stages of Bt-cotton Treatments Treatment details T1 Number of leaves Boll formation 30 DAS 60 DAS Absolute Control 29.05 52.55 79.35 84.25 T2 RDF 29.10 62.09 84.25 122.16 T3 Soluble Fertilizers 34.86 75.50 97.10 143.65 T4 NPK Briquettes 31.38 67.63 88.60 126.78 T5 NPK + Zn Briquettes 31.55 62.24 93.65 130.60 31.15 0.340 1.060 64.00 0.538 1.678 88.59 0.463 1.444 121.48 0.724 2.255 Grand mean SEm (±) CD at 5% 720 Last picking Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11): 717-723 Table.3 Effects of treatments on dry matter (gm plant-1) at various growth stages of Bt-cotton Dry matter (gm plant-1) Treatments Treatment details 60 DAS Boll formation Last picking Absolute Control 35.35 84.45 297.40 T1 RDF 35.99 105.34 347.94 T2 Soluble Fertilizers 38.43 120.09 409.48 T3 NPK Briquettes 36.22 113.13 356.26 T4 NPK + Zn Briquettes 37.41 119.61 359.41 T5 36.68 108.52 354.13 Grand mean 0.280 0.506 1.777 SEm (±) 0.871 1.576 5.537 CD at 5% Table.4 Effects of treatments on total no of boll/plant (No.) and boll weight (gm) at various growth stages of Bt-cotton Treatments Treatment details Total no of boll/plant (No.) Boll weight(gm) Absolute Control 44.88 4.37 T1 RDF 47.87 5.19 T2 Soluble Fertilizers 51.83 5.75 T3 NPK Briquettes 51.63 5.25 T4 NPK + Zn Briquettes 51.77 5.55 T5 49.59 5.22 Grand mean 0.432 0.15 SEm (±) 1.345 0.469 CD at 5% 721 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11): 717-723 Table.5 Effects of treatments on seed cotton yield (q ha-1) and Stalk yield (q ha-1) at various growth stages of Bt-cotton Seed cotton Stalk Yield Treatments Treatment details Yield q/ha q/ha Absolute Control 10.74 54.35 T1 RDF 12.15 63.50 T2 Soluble Fertilizers 15.59 74.84 T3 NPK Briquettes 11.670 65.14 T4 NPK + Zn Briquettes 14.11 65.64 T5 12.85 64.69 Grand mean 0.173 0.51 SEm (±) 0.539 1.54 CD at 5% Yield attributes revealed that number of bolls per plant increased from 44.88 to 51.83, respectively. The maximum number of bolls per plant and boll weight was observed with treatment T3 (RDF through fertigation with water soluble fertilizer). However the number of bolls produced under treatment NPK briquette and NPK +Zn briquette were almost same. Treatment T3, T4 and T5 showed significant increase in number of bolls per plant over control and RDF (conventional fertilizer). These findings are achieved by application of nutrients by fertigation in conformation with earlier reported by Veerapurthiran and Chinnusamy (2005), Bharambe et al., (1997) (Table 4). have significantly produces maximum cotton yield (15.59 q ha-1) compared to other treatments. The Dry matter (Stalk) yield recorded under same set of treatment followed the trend of seed cotton yield. From the above results, it can be inferred that due to application of soluble fertilizer through fertigation improved the seed cotton and stalk yield these are reported by Bharambe et al., (1997), Tumbare et al., (1999), Thind et al., (2008). From the result and discussion of this study, it can be concluded that the growth and yield of Bt cotton showed significantly superior with the application of RDF through a fertigation (soluble fertilizer) @ 80:40:40 NPK kg ha-1 followed by multinutrient NPK + Zn briquettes application @ 120:60:60 NPK +20 ZnSO4 Kg ha-1. The yield of cotton regarding effect of multinutrient briquettes, conventional fertilizer application and fertigation are presented in Table 5, The application of soluble fertilizers 722 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(11): 717-723 fertigation. M.Sc. Thesis (Unpub.), Dr. PDKV. Akola. Raskar, B. S., P. G. Bhoi and D. D. Pawar. (2001). Effect of planting technique and water soluble fertilizers on pre-monsoon cotton under drip irrigation J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv. 26(3): 138-143. Reddy, S., B. and E. Aruna. (2010). Effects of doses and split application of nutrients through fertigation in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) J. Cotton Res. Dev. 24(1): 59-63. Tekale, D. D., R. K. Patil, M. R. More, R. G. Nadre and V. G. Vaishnav. (2000). Effect of different levels of nitrogen application through drip irrigation on the yield of cotton (cv. NHH-44). J. Soils Crops. 10(1): 66-68. Thind, H. S., M. S. Aujla, G. S. Buttar. (2008). Response of cotton to various levels of nitrogen and water applied to normal and paired sown cotton under drip irrigation in relation to check-basin. Agricultural Water Management. 95: 25-34. Tumbare, A. D., B. N. Shinde and S. U. Bhoite. (1999). Effects of liquid fertilizer through drip irrigation on growth and yield of okra (Hibiscus esculentus). Indian J. Agron. 44: 176-178. Veeraputhiran R., Kandasamy O. S., Singh S. D. S., Chinnusamy C. (2005) Influence of drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigation on growth and yield of hybrid cotton. J. Ecobiology. 17(4):329-335. Wadatkar, S. B., Thakare, S. H., Bhamodkar, M. A. and Deshmukh, H. D. (2001). Feasibility of liquid fertilizer through drip irrigation to cotton. PKV Res. J. 25(1): 54-55. References Bharambe, P. R., Narwade S.K., Oza, S. R, Vaishnava, V. G., Shelke D. K. and Jadhav G. S. (1997). Nitrogen management in cotton through drip irrigation. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 45(4): 705-709. Hallikeri, S. S. Halemani, H. L., Mahajanashetty and Patil, B. C. (2010). Effect of fertigation on cotton productivity. Annual Report submitted in Annual workshop, CICR, Nagpur, April, 24, 2010: P-37. Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. pp. 134-182. Mussaddak Janat., Somi G. (2001). Performance of cotton crop grown under surface irrigation and drip fertigation. Seed cotton yield, dry matter production and lint properties. Comm. Soil. Sci. and Pl. Analysis. 32(19/20):3045-3061. Patil, V. C., H. L. Halemani, B. T. Nadagouda, R. Naganagouda, B. S. Yenagi and Rudragouda. (2004). Studies on irrigation requirement of hybrid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under drip irrigation. International Symposium on "Strategies for Sustainable Cotton Production - A Global Vision", Vol. 2. Crop Production. held on 23rd to 25th November, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka. Patil, V. D, Pholane, L.P. and Adsul, P.B. (2001). Plant nutrient mining in different agroclimatic zones of Maharashtra. Fertilizer News July 2001: 46(7)/43-48 and 51-54. Patke, N. K. (2003). Nitrogen management of pre-monsoon hybrid cotton through How to cite this article: Sunil, B.H., V.D. Patil, M. Pushpalatha and Basavaprasad, V.M. 2017. Effect of Multinutrient (N, P, K and Zn) Briquettes on Growth and Yield of Bt Cotton. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6(11): 717-723. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.084 723
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.