Effect of forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India

pdf
Số trang Effect of forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India 8 Cỡ tệp Effect of forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India 181 KB Lượt tải Effect of forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India 0 Lượt đọc Effect of forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India 1
Đánh giá Effect of forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India
4.8 ( 20 lượt)
Nhấn vào bên dưới để tải tài liệu
Để tải xuống xem đầy đủ hãy nhấn vào bên trên
Chủ đề liên quan

Nội dung

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(9): 2331- 2338 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 8 Number 09 (2019) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.268 Effect of Forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India Vikash Singh*, Kamal Kishore Agrawal and Amit Kumar Jha Department of Agronomy, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh, India- 482004 *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Keywords Forchlorfenuron, Rice (Oryza sativa L.), Growth and yield Article Info Accepted: 22 August 2019 Available Online: 10 September 2019 The field experiment on the Effect of Forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India was conducted at Krishi Nagar Farm, Department of Agronomy, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh) during Kharif 2018.The treatments comprising of forchlorfenuron at different doses were applied at panicle initiation (PI) stage through foliar spray @ 520, 1040, 1560, 2080, 2600, 3120, 3640 g ha-1 and untreated control (No foliar spray) in randomized block design with three replications. Among all the treatments growth parameters of rice (viz., plant height, number of tillers hill-1, dry matter accumulation) and yield attributes (viz., effective tillers hill-1, panicle length, panicle weight and sound grains panicle-1) were significantly maximum in plots receiving foliar spray of forchlorfenuron @ 3640 g ha -1. While the test weight of rice was not influenced significantly due to different treatments of forchlorfenuron. The foliar spray of forchlorfenuron @ 3640 g ha -1 gave highest grain and straw yield (4745 and 7290 kg ha -1) over untreated control (3080 and 5460 kg ha-1). Introduction Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the monocot plant belonging to the genus Oryza under tribe Oryzeae in grass family Gramineae. (Kumhar et al., 2016a, Kumhar et al., 2016b and Kumhar et al., 2018). It provides half of total dietary carbohydrate, especially in Asian countries and it is suitable diet for more than three billion people that supplied 50-80% of their daily calorie intake (Khush, 2005 and Choudhary et al., 2011).Globally rice is grown in over 160 mha producing about 478 MT of grains annually (Anonymous, 2016). Rice is an important staple food crop of India and grown on nearly 43.19 mha area with the 2331 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(9): 2331- 2338 production of 109.70 MT and triggering productivity of 2550 kg ha-1. (Agriculture Statistics at a glance, 2017). Use of the plant growth regulators in rice has been one of the most potential tools for increasing crop production. Growth regulators like GA3, NAA and chemicals like KH2PO4 along with boron as foliar spray found to improve panicle emergence, seed set percent and seed yield in hybrid rice seed production(Zhu et al., 1998). The introduction of chemical growth regulators has added a new dimension to the possibility for improving the growth and yield of rice corp. In principle, the availability of exogenous bioregulators to modify plant growth offers great opportunity. Plant growth regulators generate metabolic and physiological responses in plants by affecting their growth and development (Hayat et al., 2010). Similarly, Choi et al., (2010) stated that application of PGR increased paddy yield. Whereas, Reddy et al.,(2009) reported that application of NAA increased yield components and yield of rice. N-(2-chloro-4-pyridy)-N′phenylurea) or forchlorfenuron (CPPU) is a synthetic cytokinin-active phenylurea with a physiologic activity exceeding that of zeatin (Mok and Mok 2001). It induces callus formation, promotes shoot regeneration, provokes seed germination, promotes fruit expansion, retards leaf senescence, etc. CPPU activity exceeds those of other adenine-type cytokinins (Singh and Syamal 2001). CPPU and its derivatives are also known as cytokinin oxidase/ dehydrogenase inhibitors (Kopecny et al., 2010). Such an ability to substitute for active adenine-type cytokinins has been demonstrated in various callus culture bioassays (Mok et al., 1982). Materials and Methods The experiment was conducted at the Krishi Nagar Farm, Department of Agronomy, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur during kharif 2018, to study Effect of Forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India. The soil of the experimental field was sandy clay loam in texture, medium in organic carbon and available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content and neutral in soil reaction. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with eight treatments and three replications. The treatments were foliar spray of forchlorfenuron @ 520 1040, 1560, 2080, 2600, 3120, 3640 g ha-1 and untreated control (No foliar spray) at per treatment was done on 2nd October 2018. Seedlings of rice variety “Kranti” were raised in nursery on 18 June 2018 and 30 days old seedling transplanted in main field manually on 18 July 2018 after its thorough puddling and leveling. Healthy seedling (two seedling hill-1) was transplanted at the planting geometry of 20 cm x 20 cm in all the plots and recommended nutrient dose of 120:60:40 N, P205, K20 kg ha-1 were applied through urea, single super phosphate and muriate of potash, respectively. Out of this, half of N and entire dose of P205 and K20 were applied at the time of transplanting and the remaining quantity of N was applied in two equal splits, one at tillering and another at panicle initiation (PI) stage. Total amount of 1092.10 mm rainfall was received in 45 rainy days. Observations were recorded on plant growth parameters (viz., plant height, number of tillers hill-1, dry matter accumulation) and yield attributing traits (viz., effective tillers hill-1, panicle length, panicle weight and sound grains panicle-1)were recorded at maturity on five randomly selected hills in each treatment. All data were subjected to analysis of variance 2332 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(9): 2331- 2338 according to the experimental design used in this study and critical difference (CD) was utilized to compare the different means of treatment. Results and Discussion Growth Parameters The plant height differed significantly due to treatments with forchlorfenuron (Table 1). The foliar spray of forchlorfenuronat panicle initiation (PI) stage increased the plant height significantly over control. The treatment of forchlorfenuron @ 3640 g ha-1 recorded tallest plant (105.67 cm) and shortest plant were noted in untreated control (100.13 cm). Similar results were reported by Watanabe and Saigusa (2004), who reported that plant height was significantly increased by the application of 50 ppm ethephon, 100 ppm GA3 alone or in combination over that of control. The increase in the plant height is due to applying of plant growth regulators and hormones was promoted vegetative growth by active cell division, cell enlargement and cell elongation and these helped in improving growth traits and also facilitated reproductive growth (Pareek et al., 2000) and these finding were in strictly agreement with results of Tiwari et al., 2011, Viramani et al., 2007 and Bakhsh et al., 2012. The significantly variation was recorded in number of tillers hill-1 and maximum number of tillers hill-1 were recorded (10.20)with spraying of forchlorfenuron @ 3640 g ha-1at par with forchlorfenuron 3120 g ha-1 (10.09) whereas untreated control was recorded lowest number of tillers (8.86). Similarly, Yin et al., 2012 found that the CPPU-treated wheat seedlings had about four tillers on average, whereas the control seedlings did not initiate tillering at 25 days after sowing. Phytohormones are the key factors that control tillering (Michael and Beringer 1980). Dry matter accumulation was noticed maximum (81.04 g hill-1) under treatment of forchlorfenuron @ 3640 g ha-1 at par with forchlorfenuron @ 3120 g ha-1 resulted in dry matter production (79.32 g hill-1) at harvest which is a beneficial trait from yield point of view. Untreated control plots registered the minimum production of assimilates in the assimilatory apparatus (73.20 g hill-1) at harvest(Table 1). Similarly, Jayachandran et al., (2000) studied the effect of mepiquat chloride @ 150 ppm and paclobutrazol @ 120 ppm, on rice and observed that both these treatments sprayed at flowering stage and recorded maximum dry matter of 13.5 t ha-1 and 12.6 t ha-1 respectively over control. Yield attributes and yield The number of effective tillers hill-1 as believed to be closely associated with grain yield hill-1 resulting high productivity. The number of effective tillers varied significantly due to different treatments. Maximum number of effective tillers hill-1 were recorded (10.11) with foliar spray of forchlorfenuron @ 3640 g ha-1 at par with forchlorfenuron @ 3120 g ha1 (9.96) and it was very low in untreated control (No foliar spray) (8.45) (Table 1). This result was supported by Rahman et al., 2017 who revealed that the number of effective tillers hill-1 of rice was significantly increased with the concentrations of 100 ppm NAA and 2 t ha-1 residual limes. Similar trend was reported through Miyodo application by Islam, 2007. Significant variation in panicle length were observed (Table 2), it was lengthy in forchlorfenuron @ 3640 g ha-1 (25.22 cm) at par with forchlorfenuron @ 3140 g ha-1 (25.03 cm) and over control (22.17 cm) because of more cell division, cell enlargement and cell elongation occurred in the presence of forchlorfenuron which increased panicle length. 2333 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(9): 2331- 2338 Table.1 Influence of different doses of forchlorfenuron on growth parameters of rice Treatments T1 - Untreated control T2 - Forchlorfenuron 520 g ha-1 at PI stage T3 - Forchlorfenuron 1040 g ha-1 at PI stage T4- Forchlorfenuron 1560 g ha-1 at PI stage T5 - Forchlorfenuron 2080 g ha-1 at PI stage T6 - Forchlorfenuron 2600 g ha-1 at PI stage T7 - Forchlorfenuron 3120 g ha-1 at PI stage T8- Forchlorfenuron 3640 g ha-1 at PI stage SEm± CD(P=0.05) Plant height (cm) Tillers hill-1 Effective tillers hill-1 100.13 101.20 8.86 8.90 8.45 8.76 Dry matter accumulation (g hill-1) 73.20 75.59 102.13 9.04 8.86 76.13 102.40 9.58 9.45 76.98 103.27 9.68 9.59 76.53 103.40 9.95 9.72 77.22 104.33 10.09 9.96 79.32 105.67 10.20 10.11 81.04 0.68 2.06 0.33 0.99 0.27 0.82 0.86 2.61 Table.2 Influence of different doses of forchlorfenuron on different yield attributes and yield of rice Treatments Panicle length (cm) Panicle weight (g) Sound Grains panicle- Test weight (g) Grain yield (kg ha-1) Straw yield (kg ha-1) 1 T1 - Untreated control T2 - Forchlorfenuron 520 g ha-1 at PI stage T3 - Forchlorfenuron 1040 g ha-1 at PI stage T4- Forchlorfenuron 1560 g ha-1 at PI stage T5 - Forchlorfenuron 2080 g ha-1 at PI stage T6 - Forchlorfenuron 2600 g ha-1 at PI stage T7 - Forchlorfenuron 3120 g ha-1 at PI stage T8- Forchlorfenuron 3640 g ha-1 at PI stage SEm± CD(P=0.05) 22.17 23.61 5.18 5.56 141.44 145.44 24.78 24.83 3080 3590 5460 6083 24.04 5.70 150.22 24.91 3631 6140 24.17 5.81 157.44 25.04 3909 6241 24.41 5.95 162.33 25.12 4040 6293 24.84 6.37 168.89 25.23 4343 6743 25.03 6.75 173.78 25.31 4553 7140 25.22 6.81 177.89 25.43 4745 7290 0.32 0.98 0.28 0.85 4.83 14.62 0.24 NS 90 274 79 240 2334 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(9): 2331- 2338 Similarly, Pandey et al., (2017) reported that the application of GA3 at 60, 90 and 120 g ha-1 significantly increases the panicle length of rice 21.08, 22.56 and 23 cm respectively over control (19.66 cm). The panicle weight was increased markedly with corresponding increase in the doses of forchlorfenuron from 520 to 3640 g ha-1 (5.56 to 6.81 g respectively). Significantly heaviest panicle weight (6.81 g) were noted under forchlorfenuron@ 3640 g ha-1over its remaining treatments (Table 2). This result was supported by Pandey et al., (2001) who reported that the treatments of cytokinin soil application (40 ppm) + triacontanol foliar application (10 ppm) at 25 and 50 DAT increased the panicle weight as compared to control. The sound grains panicle-1 increased in all the treatment over control. Number of sound grains panicle-1 were more in -1 forchlorfenuron@ 3640 g ha at par with forchlorfenuron@ 3120 g ha-1 and lowest was recorded in untreated control(Table 2). The total sound grains panicle-1 was increased with forchlorfenuron as it obtained higher yield attributing characters. This result was supported with the work of Thuc et al., (2016) who revealed that the application of paclobutrazol at 50 mg L-1 significantly increases the number of filled grains panicle1 of rice over control. The test weight did not shows any significant variation among different treatments (Table 2) and these results were in conformity with results of Elankavi et al., 2009 and Nataraj et al., 2016.The possible reason for a nonsignificant difference in test weight under the treatments was due to varietal characters i.e. similarity in size and shape of individual grains. These results are in collaboration with the findings of Chauhan et al.,2013. The grain yield is very complex trait, it is multiplicative end product of several basic components of yield such as panicle length, panicle excretion and productive tillers. The significantly maximum grain and straw yield were recorded with forchlorfenuron@ 3640 g ha-1 (4745 and 7290 kg ha-1) and it wasat par with forchlorfenuron@ 3120 g ha-1 (4553 and 7140 kg ha-1) and minimum in untreated control (3080 and 5460 kg ha-1) (Table 2). The increase in grain yield with application of plant growth regulators due to active translocation of photosynthesis and mobilization of reserve food materials in plant and to the developing sink by the increasing development of hydrolyzing and oxidizing enzyme activities and leads to increase grain yield (Elankavi et al., 2009). Gurmani, et al., (2006) reported an increased paddy yield with application of plant growth regulator, while comparing different plant growth regulators (ABA, BA and CCC) and their effects on yield and yield attributing characters. The enhanced yield with growth regulator may be due to increase in panicle length, and number of panicles. The finding is also similar with Pandey et al., 2001, whom reported that IAA @ 50 ppm produced significantly maximum grain yield hill-1, 1000-grain weight and yield kg ha-1. Many other researchers studied that, the application of plant growth regulators supplied by exogenously and was observed that increase grain yield due to undergo several metabolic processes in the soil resulting in loss of their activity and reduced availability to plants and these type of behavior were only seen with application of IAA and gibberellic acid. These results were in conformity Zahir et al., 2007, Yogeesha et al., 2000 and Shi-Hua et al., 2006. From the present experiment it is concluded that application of forchlorfenuron @ 3640 g ha-1at panicle initiation stage significant enhanced growth, yield attributing characters and yield of rice. The increase grain yield was 35.09% higher over control treatment. 2335 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(9): 2331- 2338 References Agricultural Statistics at a glance. 2017. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 86-88. Anonymous. 2016. Rice Yearbook. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington DC. Bakhsh I, Awan IU, Niamatullah KU, Zama S, Ramzan and Khan EA. 2012. Effect of naphthalene acetic acid and different phosphorus levels on panicles, spikelets, sterility, normal kernel, yield and benefit cost ratio of rice. The Journal ofAnimal & Plant Sciences. 22(1): 169-174. Chauhan BS and Opena J. 2013. Weed management and grain yield of rice sown at low seeding rates in mechanized dry-seeded systems. Journal of FieldCrops Research 141:9– 15. Chauhan PS, Jha AK and Soni M. 2013. Efficacy of chlorimuron-ethyl againstweeds in transplanted rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science 45(2):135–136. Choi JH, Abe N, Tanaka H, Fushimi K, Nishina Y, Morita A, Kiriiwa Y, Motohashi R, Hashizume D, Koshino H and Kawagishi H (2010). Plantgrowth regulator, imidazole-4carboxamide, produced by the fairy ring forming fungus Lepistasordida. JournalAgric Food Chem., 58(18): 9956-9959. Choudhary N, Ahuja U, Chawala V, Jain RK, Kumari P and Batan KR. 2011. Morphological and molecular variability in weedy rice of Haryana.Asian Journal of Agriculture Research (5): 250-259. Elankavi S, Kuppuswamy G, Vaiyapuri V and Raman R. 2009. Effect of Phytohormones on growth and yield of rice. Oryza. 46: 310-313. Gavino RB, Pi Y, Abon Jr CC. 2008. Application of geberellic acid (GA3) in dosages for three hybrid rice seed production in the Philippines. Journal of Agricultural Technology. 4(1): 183192. Gurmani AR, Banno A and Saleem M. 2006. Effect of growth regulator on growth, yield and ion accumulation of rice.Pak. Journal Bot. 38 (5): 1415-1424. Hayat QS, Hayat M, Irfan and AA 2010. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid under changing environment. Journal Enviro. Exp. Bot., 68(1): 14-25. Islam M Z. 2007. Effect of Miyodo on growth and yield of bororice (BRRI dhan-29). M. S. Thesis, Department Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh Jayachandran MP, Rajendran and Thangaraj M. 2000. Effect of growth regulators on growth and yield of wet season rice. Madras Agricultural Journal. 87 (4-6): 340-341. Khush GS. 2005. What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Molecular Biology. 59, 1-6. Kopecny D, Briozzo P, Popelkova H, Sebela M, Koncitíkova R, Spichal L, Nisler J, Madzak C, Frebort I, Laloue M, Houba- Herin N 2010.Phenyl- and benzylureacytokinins as competitive inhibitors of cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase: a structural study.Biochimie 92:1052–62. Kumhar BL, Ameta HK &Rewar SK. 2016b. Direct seeded rice is a reduce input of rice production in India- A Review. Journal Progressive Agri. 7 (1)17-19. Kumhar BL, Chavan VG and Tilekar RN. 2016a. Economic analysis, drymatter accumulation and uptake of NPK of different rice establishment methods 2336 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(9): 2331- 2338 different varieties. Res. JournalAgril. Sciences 7(3): 617-621. Kumhar BL, Chavan VG, Agrawal KK, Jha AK and Kumar V. 2018. Study of different rice establishment methods on growth and yield of different varieties. Bhartiya Krishi AnushandhanPatrika, 33(4): 283-286. Michael G and Beringer H. 1980. The role of hormones in yield formation In: Proceeding of the 15th Colloquium of the International Potash Institute1 Held in Wageningen, the Netherlands, 28:252–279. Mok DWS and Mok MC. 2001. Cytokinin metabolism and action. Annu Rev of Plant Physiol and Plant MolBiol 52:89–118. Mok MC, Mok DWS, Armstrong DJ, Shudo K, Isogai Y, Okamoto T1982. Cytokinin activity of N-phenyl-N01,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea (Thidiazuron). Phytochemistry 21:1509–1511. Nataraj K, Gowda R, Shivkumar N, Yogananda SB, Devaraju PJ and Mahadevu P. 2016. Influence of Plant Growth Regulators on the Plant Growth and Seed Yield of F1 Hybrid Rice (KRH-4). International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 8(42): 18541856. Pandey AK., Tripathi RS and Yadav RS. 2001. Effect of certain growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian Journal Agric. Res. 35(2): 118-120. Pandey G, Nautiyal MK, Chauhan P and Kandpal G. 2017. Assessment of appropriate dosage of gibberellic acid (GA3) for better seed yield of a promising hybrid rice variety. International Journal of Chemical Studies 5(4): 1603-1607. Pareek N, Jat K and PareekRG. 2000.Haryan JournalAgron., 16,104-109. Rahman MS, Sarker BC, Akhter M, Bashar MA and Islam MR 2017. Influence of residual lime and plant growth regulator (NAA) on the morphological and physio-chemical traits of aromatic rice cv. Kataribhog. SAARC Journal Agri., 15(1): 189-197 Reddy NM, Keshavulu K, Durga KK, Ankaiah R and Adrana K. 2009. Effect of nutrientsalternate to GA3 on yield and quality in hybrid rice seed production. Journal Res. Crops., 10(3): 718-722. Shi-Hua YC, Ben-YI W, Jian-LI, Wei-Feng S. and Shi-Hua C. 2006.Rice Sci., 13,1-8. Singh SK and Syamal MM 2001. A short preculture soak in thidiazuron or forchlorfenuron improves axillary shoot proliferation in rose micropropagation. SciHortic 91:169– 177 JakharSR, Singh J, Kumhar BL and Choudhary BK. 2018. Modern Techniques of Crop Productivity for Agriculture Sustainability Weser Publication, Zittau, Germeny, ISBN: 978-3-96492-049-2. Thuc LV, Duy MV, Hoi NTandNhung MT 2016. The effects of a potential retardant on the stem’s hardness, growth and yield of IR50404 rice.Vietnam Journal Agri. Sci., 14, (10): 1557 -1563. Tiwari DK, Pandey P, Giri SP and Dwivedi JL. 2011. Effect of GA3 and Other Plant Growth Regulators on Hybrid Rice Seed Production. Asian journal of plantsciences, 10 (2): 133-139. Viramani SS, Mao CX, Toledo RS, Hossain M and Jannaiah A. 2007. http://www.agent.org/library/tb/156/tbl 56.pdf. Watanabe H and Siagusa M. 2004. Effects of combine application of ethephon and gibberellin on growth and nutrient uptake of rice seedling growing under 2337 Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2019) 8(9): 2331- 2338 direct seedling conditions. Proc. 4th Int’l Crop Sci, Brisbane, Australia. Available at: http://www.cropscience.com/ Yin N, Xin M, Zhang W, Feng D, Wang H, Kong L and Tian J. 2012. Analysis of Differential Proteins Induced by Forchlorfenuron in Wheat. Plant MolBiol Rep., 30:949–956. Yogeesha HS, Pandey S. and Sharma SP. 2000.Seed Res., 28, 87-89. Zahir AZ, Iqbal M, Arshad M, Naveed M and Khalid M. 2007.Pak. Journal Bot., 39, 761-768. Zhu YY and Lia W. 1998. The yield effect of spraying with water soluble GA3 in hybrid rice seed production. Zhejiang nongye, Kexue, 3: 129-130. How to cite this article: Vikash Singh, Kamal Kishore Agrawal and Amit Kumar Jha. 2019. Effect of Forchlorfenuron on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during Kharif season of Central India. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 8(09): 2331- 2338. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.268 2338
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.