Nội dung

Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(4):391-399 Research article Open Access Full Text Article Chemical constituents and the inhibition of α -glucosidase of Gynura procumbens (Lour.) Merr. Le Thi My Quyen, Nguyen Thi Diem Quynh, Dang Hoang Phu, Nguyen Thi Y Nhi, Tran Le Quan* ABSTRACT Use your smartphone to scan this QR code and download this article Introduction: Gynura procumbens (Lour.) Merr. (Family: Asteraceae) is mainly popular in SouthEast Asian countries for its traditional medicinal properties. It is usually used as a traditional medicine for the treatment of eruptive fevers, rash, kidney disease, migraines, constipation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cancer. It is commonly used as a traditional medicine in Vietnam for the treatment of many diseases. Methods: The leaves and trunks of G. procumbens were collected, macerated with methanol. The extracts from MeOH-soluble extract were processed by the column chromatographic technique to give pure compounds, and the nuclear magnetic resonance methods were applied to determine their chemical structures. The inhibitory activities of these extracts against α -glucosidase were conducted and compared with acarbose. Results: Seven organic compounds were isolated and determined the structures, including syringic acid (1), quercetin (2), N,N-dimethylanthranilic acid (3), dehydrovomifoliol (4), β -sitosterol 3-O-β -D-glucopyranoside (5), schottenol (6), montanic acid (7). The inhibition of α -glucosidase test results in the IC50 values of the four extracts, which were lower than those of acarbose. Conclusion: Seven pure compounds were identified from the leaves and trunks of G. procumbens, including two compounds being isolated from G. procumbens for the first time. The test results showed that the parts of G. procumbens were active as α -glucosidase inhibitor, which would be useful to support the treatment for diabetes. Key words: Gynura procumbens, syringic acid, quercetin, α -glucosidase INTRODUCTION Faculty of Chemistry, University of Science, VNU-HCM Correspondence Tran Le Quan, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Science, VNU-HCM Email: tlquan@hcmus.edu.vn History • Received: 2019-11-13 • Accepted: 2019-12-17 • Published: 2019-12-31 DOI : 10.32508/stdj.v22i4.1725 Copyright © VNU-HCM Press. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Gynura is the genus of the Asteraceae family, includes 20 species spread all over the world, particularly in Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Korea, and the Philippines. G. procumbens (Lour.) Merr. (Figure 1) is a herbal material widely used in tropical countries for the treatment of various health ailments such as cancers, lymphatic pain, hypertension, skin diseases, diabetes mellitus…) 1,2 . Nowadays, people in various tropical regions consume an increasing amount of G. procumbens leaves in diet and tea. Research shows that the leaves do not have any toxicity 2 . Pharmacologic studies have reported that G. procumbens has antioxidant, anti-Herpes simplex, anti-hyperglycemic, anti-hyperlipidemic, antiinflammatory, analgesic, and reducing blood hypertension properties. The health benefits of G. procumbens are related to some of its bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids, saponins, and alkaloids 3 . However, there were not many studies about the chemicals constituent of this plant, especially in Vietnam. This study aimed to investigate the chemical constituents from the leaves and trunks of G. procumbens, growing in Gia Lai Province, Vietnam. By column chro- matographic and spectroscopic methods seven compounds (1-7) (Figure 2) were identified. Besides, we also tested the inhibitory activity of α -glucosidase on four extracts of this plant. METHODS Chemicals and equipment Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (HiMedia) (230-400 Mesh). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and preparative TLC were performed on silica gel GF254 (Merck), visualized by hot 10 % solution of H2 SO4 . NMR spectra were acquired on Bruker 500 Avance III at 500 MHz for 1 H-NMR and 125 MHz for 13 C-NMR spectra. The pure solvents methanol, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, petroleum ether, chloroform were from Chemsol Vina, Vietnam. Acarbose, an α -glucosidase inhibitor, was from Chem Cruz, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., USA. Plant material The leaves and trunks of G. procumbens were collected at Gia Lai province, Vietnam, in July 2016 and authenticated by Dr. Dang Van Son, Department of Biolog- Cite this article : Thi My Quyen L, Thi Diem Quynh N, Hoang Phu D, Thi Y Nhi N, Le Quan T. Chemical constituents and the inhibition of α -glucosidase of Gynura procumbens (Lour.) Merr.. Sci. Tech. Dev. J.; 22(4):391-399. 391 Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(4):391-399 Figure 1: Gynura procumbens (Lour.) Merr. Figure 2: Chemical structures for 1-7. 392 Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(4):391-399 ical Resources, Institute of Tropical Biology – Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Extraction and isolation Dried leaves and trunks were ground into powder (2.9 kg) and extracted with hot methanol (4 × 7 L) for four hours each time. The methanolic filtrate was then evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure to obtain a methanolic residue (375.0 g). The methanolic residue was then dissolved in aqueous methanol (10 % methanol) and extracted with petroleum ether (10 x 500 mL), ethyl acetate (10 x 500 mL), n-butanol (10 x 500 mL), consecutively, to afford petroleum ether (PE, 75.0 g), ethyl acetate extract (EA, 7.2 g), n-butanol (Bu, 9.9 g) and crystal compound (102.9 g). The ethyl acetate extract (EA, 7.2 g) was subjected to a silica gel column chromatography and eluted with petroleum ether–ethyl acetate (stepwise, 9:1 → 0:10) followed by ethyl acetate–methanol (stepwise, 8:2 → 6:4) to afford five main fractions EA1 (26.1 mg), EA2 (498.1 mg), EA3 (696.2 mg), EA4 (1200.6 mg), EA5 (627.9 mg). Fraction EA1 (26.1 mg) was washed and cleaned with methanol (MeOH) to give compound 1 (9.0 mg). Fraction EA5 (1200.6 mg) was subjected to a silica gel column chromatography, eluted with chloroform–methanol (CHCl3 –MeOH) (stepwise, 99:1 → 9:1) to give compound 3 (11.0 mg). Fraction EA3 (627.9 mg) was subjected to column chromatographic separation over silica gel and eluted with CHCl3 –MeOH (stepwise, 99:1 → 9:1) to give compound 2 (4.4 mg). The same manner was applied on the EA2 (498.1 mg), eluted with CHCl3 –MeOH (95:5) to give compound 4 (4.5 mg). Fraction EA4 (696.2 mg) was fractionated by a silica gel column chromatography using CHCl3 –MeOH (stepwise, 95:5 → 8:2) to give compound 5 (4.5 mg). The petroleum ether extract (PE, 75.0 g) was subjected to a silica gel column chromatography and eluted with petroleum ether–ethyl acetate (PE–EA) (stepwise, 9:1 → 0:10) to afford fractions, in these, there were two fractions which were coded as PE1 (1294.7 mg), PE2 (2851.0 mg). By subjecting to a silica gel column chromatographic and eluting with appropriate solvents, fraction PE1 gave compound 6, PE2 gave compound 7. Compound 1 (syringic acid): white needle-shaped crystals, 1 H- and 13 C-NMR (Table 1). Compound 2 (quercetin): yellow powder, 1 H- and 13 C-NMR (Table 1). Compound 3 (N,N-dimethylanthranilic acid): white powder, 1 H- and 13 C-NMR (Table 1), ESI/MS m/z 188.0723 [M+Na]+ . Compound 4 (dehydrovomifoliol): white crystals, 1 H- and 13 C-NMR (Table 1). 3-O-β -DCompound 5 (β -sitosterol glucopyranoside): white powder, 1 H-NMR (pyridine-d5 ) δ H (ppm): 3.93 (1H, m, H-3),5.34 (1H, m, H-6), 0.65 (3H, s, H-18), 0.92 (3H, s, H-19), 0.98 (3H, d, J = 6.5, H-21), 0.85 (3H, d, J = 7.0, H-26), 0.87 (3H, d, J = 7.0, H-27), 0.88 (3H, t, J = 7.0, H-29) 13 C-NMR (pyridine-d ) δ (ppm): 37.7 (C-1), 30.4 C 5 (C-2), 78.7 (C-3), 40.1 (C-4), 141.1 (C-5), 122.1 (C-6), 32.4 (C-7), 32.3 (C-8), 50.5 (C-9), 37.1 (C-10), 21.5 (C-11), 39.5 (C-12), 42.7 (C-13), 57.0 (C-14), 24.7 (C-15), 28.7 (C-16), 56.4 (C-17), 12.2 (C-18), 19.6 (C-19), 36.6 (C-20), 19.2 (C-21), 34.4 (C-22), 26.6 (C-23), 46.2 (C-24), 29.7 (C-25), 19.4 (C-26), 20.2 (C-27), 23.6 (C-28), 12.4 (C29), 102.7 (C-1’), 75.5 (C-2’), 78.6 (C-3’), 71.9 (C-4’), 78.4 (C-5’), 63.0 (C-6’). Compound 6 (schottenol): white crystals, 1 H-NMR (CDCl3 ) δ H (ppm): 3.60 (1H, m, H-3), 5.18 (1H, m, J = 4.6 Hz, H-7), 0.55 (3H, s, C-18), 0.80 (3H, s, H-19), 0.83 (3H, d, H-26), 0.85 (3H, d, H-27), 0.98 (3H, d, J=7.0 Hz, H-21), 0.86 (3H, d, H-29); 13 CNMR (CDCl3 ) δ C (ppm): 37.16 (C-1), 31.48 (C-2), 71.09 (C-3), 37.99 (C-4), 40.28 (C-5), 29.66 (C-6), 117.42 (C-7), 139.69 (C-8), 49.48 (C-9), 22.97 (C-11), 39.59 (C-12), 55.06 (C-14), 23.10 (C-15), 27.95 (C16), 56.12 (C-17), 11.84 (C-18), 13.03 (C-19), 36.59 (C-20), 21.56 (C-21), 34.22 (C-22), 26.25 (C-23), 45.88 (C-24), 29.21 (C-25), 18.91 (C-26), 19.05 (C27), 19.81 (C-28), 11.97 (C-29). Compound 7 (montanic acid): white crystals, HRESI-MS m/z 423.4234 [M-H]− , 1 H-NMR (CDCl3 ) δ H (ppm): 2.35 (2H, t, J=7.5 Hz, H-2), 1.63 (2H, quint, H-3), 1.25 (2nH, s), 0.88 (3H, t, J =6.9 Hz); 13 C-NMR (CDCl3 ) δ C (ppm): 178.85 (C-1), 33.84 (C-2), 31.92 (C-3), 29.06-29.69 (C-4 to C-26), 24.70 (C-27), 22.68 (C-28), 14.10 (C-29). Test of inhibition of α -glucosidase Test of inhibition of α -glucosidase was performed at Research Center Of Ginseng & Materia Medica, Ho Chi Minh City on four extracts methanol (GP Me), ethyl acetate (GP - EA), n-butanol (GP - Bu) and petroleum ether (GP - PE). The inhibitory activity of α -glucosidase was determined by the previous method 4 with some adjustments. Samples were dissolved in the DMSO solvent. A mixture of 60 µ L of sample and 50 µ L of phosphate buffer 0.1 M (pH 6.8) containing α -glucosidase solution (0.2 U.mL−1 ) was incubated in the wells of 96-well plates at 37 ◦ C for 10 minutes. After incubating, added 50 µ L of p-nitrophenyl-α -D-glucopyranoside (p-NPG) prepared in phosphate buffer 0.1 M (pH 6.8) into each 393 Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(4):391-399 well and the wells were continuously incubated for 20 minutes. OD was measured on the spectrophotometer at 405 nm with a microdisk reader (Bio Tek, USA) and compared it with a control sample containing a 60 µ L buffer solution in place of the test sample. The test result data was expressed by the average of triplicated experiments. The IC50 value is the concentration of the extract required to inhibit 50 % of α -glucosidase activity under the assay conditions. Acarbose was used as a positive control. RESULTS The powdered leaves and trunks of G. procumbens were extracted with hot methanol. The MeOHsoluble extract was successively partitioned to yield petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol-soluble fractions. By using column chromatographic technique and the nuclear magnetic resonance methods, seven organic compounds were isolated and determined to be syringic acid (1), quercetin (2), N,N-dimethylanthranilic acid (3), dehydrovomifoliol (4), β -sitosterol 3-O-β -D-glucopyranoside (5), schottenol (6), montanic acid (7). In these, two compounds (3), (4) were isolated from G. procumbens for the first time. Compound 1 (Figure 2) was obtained as white needle-shaped crystals, completely soluble in MeOH, acetone, CHCl3 . The 1 H-NMR spectrum of compound 1 showed the resonance signal of eight protons, including six protons of the two methoxyl groups at δ H 3.88 (6H, s) and two cumulative protons at δ H 7.33 (2H, s, H-6). It showed that compound 1 contains 1, 3, 4, 5 four-substituted aromatic nucleus. The 13 CNMR spectrum of compound 1 has six carbon signals. There is a carbonyl carbon signal of the carboxyl group at δ C 167.5 (C-7), carbon signals of the two methoxyl groups at δ C 56.7 (3-OCH3 , 5-OCH3 ) and the six carbons of the benzene ring, composed of tertiary carbons at δ C 148.4 (C-3, C-5); 141.6 (C-4); 121.5 (C-1) and methine carbons at δ C 108.2 (C-2, C6). The HMBC spectra of compound 1 showed that the proton signal of the methoxyl group δ H 3.88 (6H, s) correlated to the signal at δ C 148.4 (C-3, C-5) of a oxygen-carrying carbon. Therefore, two methoxyl groups bind to the C-3 and C-5 positions of the benzene ring. In addition, HMBC spectrum of 1 also showed a correlation of the proton signal at δ H 7.33 (2H, s, H-2, H-6) to the signals at δ C 148.4 (C-3, C5), 141.6 (C-4); 121.5 (C-1); 108.2 (C-2, C-6); 167.5 (C-7). Comparing the spectral data of compound 1 with syringic acid 5 gave the similarities. These above facts showed that compound 1 was syringic acid. 394 Compound 2 (Figure 2) was obtained as a yellow powder, completely soluble in DMSO. The 1 H-NMR spectrum displayed five aromatic protons at δ H 6.16 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-6), 6.39 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-8), 7.86 (1H, dd, J1 = 8.5 Hz, J2= 2.5 Hz, H-6’), 6.86 (1H, d, J = 8.5, H-5’), 7.64 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2’), of which H-6 grafted meta with H-8, H-6’ grafted ortho with H5’ and grafted meta with H-2’. Therefore, compound 2 contains two benzene rings, in that, H-6 and H-8 were in the first ring, H-2’ and H-6’ were in the second ring. One signal at δ H 12.44 (1H, s, 5-OH) indicated a proton which made intramolecular hydrogen bonding with a carbonyl group at δ C 147.7 (C-4). In 9.0 to 13.0 ppm region, there were signals characterized hydroxyl protons at δ H 10.75, 9.49, 9.28. The 13 CNMR spectrum showed fifteen carbon signals. The signal at δ C 175.7 (C-4) displayed a carbonyl carbon. In the low-field magnetic resonance, there were seven signals of aromatic carbons which linked to oxygen at δ C 146.8 (C-2), 135.5 (C-3), 160.6 (C-5), 163.8 (C7), 155.9 (C-9), 144.9 (C-3’), 147.7 (C-4). The carbon signals were attributed to the first ring at δ C 102.87 (C-10), 98.2 (C-6), 93.3 (C-8) and to the second ring at δ C 121.9 (C-1’), 114.9 (C-2’), 115.6 (C-5’), 119.9 (C-6’). Comparing the spectral data of compound 2 with quercetin 6 gave the similarities. These above facts showed that compound 2 was quercetin. Compound 3 (Figure 2) was obtained as a white powder, completely soluble in acetone. HR-ESI-MS of compound 3 exhibited an ion peak at m/z 188.0723 [M+Na]+ , consistent with a molecular formula of C9H11NO2. The 1 H-NMR spectrum showed four aromatic protons at δ H 7.72 (1H, dd, J1= 8.0 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz, H-3),7.41 (1H, td, J1= 7.9 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz, H-4), 7.66 (1H, td, J1 = 7.3 Hz, J2 = 1.6 Hz, H-5), 8.12 (1H, dd, J1 = 7.5 Hz, J2 = 1.5 Hz, H-6). The signal at δ H 2.85 (6H, s) showed protons of two methyl groups linked with nitrogen. The 13 C-NMR spectrum exhibited eight carbon signals, of which six signals at δ C 126.3 (C-1), 153.4 (C-2), 123.5 (C-3), 134.8 (C-4), 128.1 (C-5), 132.2 (C-6) were attributed to the aromatic ring, whereas a signal at δ C 45.7 (C-8, C-9) characterized as two methyl groups linked with nitrogen and a signal at δ C 167.2 (C-7) displayed a carbonyl carbon. The HMBC spectrum of compound 3 showed that the proton at δ H 7.72 (1H, dd, H-3) correlated with signals at δ C 128.1 (C-5); the proton at δ H 7.41 (1H, td, H-4) correlated with signals at δ C 126.3 (C-1), 123.5 (C-3); the proton at δ H 7.66 (1H, td, H-5) correlated with signals at δ C 153.4 (C-2), 132.2 (C-6); the signal at δ H 8.12 (1H, dd, H-6) correlated with signals at δ C 134.8 (C-4), 153.4 (C-2), 167.2 Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(4):391-399 (C-7); the signal of protons at δ H 2.85 (6H, s) correlated with the signal at δ C 153.4 (C-2) and 45.7 (C8, C-9). By analyzing the 1 H-NMR, 13 C-NMR, MS, HMBC spectral data and comparing the spectral data of compound 3 with reference 7 , the structure of compound 3 was given as N,N-dimethylanthranilic acid. Compound 4 (Figure 2) was obtained as white crystals, completely soluble in methanol, acetone. The 1 H-NMR spectrum gave nine proton signals, which included two olefin protons grafted trans at δ H 7.04 (1H, d, 16 Hz, H-7) and 6.49 (1H, d, 16 Hz, H-8); one olefin proton at 5.98 (1H, s, H-4); two methylene protons at δ H 2.29 (1H, d, 17 Hz, H-2), 2.58 (1H, d, 17 Hz, H-2); four proton signals of methyl group at δ H 2.35 (3H, s, H-10), 1.12 (3H, s, H-11), 1.07 ( 3H, s, H-12), 1.95 (3H, s, H-13). The 13 C-NMR spectrum showed thirteen carbon signals. Two signals at δ C 200.3 (C3), 203.6 (C-9) characterized two carbonyl carbons; one quaternary olefin carbon at δ C 164.6 (C-5); three tertiary olefin carbons at δ C 128.0 (C-4), 131.7 (C-8), 148.3 (C-7); two quaternary carbons at δ C 80.0 (C-6), 42.6 (C-1); one methylene carbon at 50.6 (C-2) and four methyl carbons at δ C 27.6 (C-10), 23.5 (C-11), 24.7 (C-12), 19.1 (C-13). By analyzing the 1 H-NMR and 13 C-NMR spectral data and comparing the spectral data of compound 4 with reference 8 , the structure of compound 4 was given as dehydrovomifoliol. Compound 5 (Figure 2) was obtained as a white powder, completely soluble in DMSO. The 1 H-NMR spectral data of 5 showed the present of six methyl groups at δ H 0.65 (3H, s, H-18), 0.92 (3H, s, H-19), 0.98 (3H, d, J = 6.5, H-21), 0.85 (3H, d, J = 7.0, H-26), 0.87 (3H, d, J = 7.0, H-27), 0.88 (3H, t, J = 7.0, H-29). The signal at δ H 3.93 (1H, m, H-3) appeared as multilet displayed proton H-3. A signal at δ H 5.34 (1H, m, H-6) was the characteristics of double bond between quaternary carbon and methine carbon in the ring B. The 13 C-NMR spectrum showed compound 5 has 35 carbon signals. The signals at δ C 12.2 (C18), 19.6 (C-19), 19.2 (C-21), 19.4 (C-26), 20.2 (C-27), 12.4 (C29) were methyl carbons. Methylene carbons appeared at δ C 37.7 (C-1), 30.4 (C-2), 40.1 (C-4), 32.4 (C-7), 21.5 (C-11), 39.5 (C-12), 24.7 (C-15), 28.7 (C16), 34.4 (C-22), 26.6 (C-23), 23.6 (C-28). Methine carbons were at δ C 78.7 (C-3), 122.1 (C-6), 32.3 (C-8), 50.5 (C-9), 57.0 (C-14), 56.4 (C-17), 36.6 (C-20), 46.2 (C-24), 29.7 (C-25). Quaternary carbons appeared at δ C 141.1 (C-5), 37.1 (C-10), 42.7 (C-13). Furthermore, the 1 H-NMR and 13 C-NMR spectral date of compound 5 displayed the present of a glucose unit. A signal among them appeared at δ C 102.7 (C-1’) presented anomeric carbon. Besides, the signal of methylene carbon C-6’ appeared at δ C 63.0 and the other four methine carbons, which linked to oxygen, appeared at δ C 75.5 (C-2’), 78.6 (C-3’), 71.9 (C-4’), 78.4 (C-5’). Comparing the spectral data of compound 5 with β -sitosterol 3-O-β -D-glucopyranoside 9 gave the similarities. These above facts indicated that compound 5 was β -sitosterol 3-O-β -D-glucopyranoside. Compound 6 (Figure 2) was obtained as white crystals, completely soluble in chloroform. The 1 H-NMR spectrum gave an olefin proton at δ H 5.18 (1H, m, J = 4.6 Hz, H-7) and one methyl proton at δ H 3.60 (1H, m, H-3). In the high-field magnetic resonance, there were six signals characterized methyl protons including one methyl group grafted with secondary carbon at δ H 0.86 (3H, d, H-29), three methyl groups grafted with tertiary carbons at δ H 0.83 (3H, d, H-26), 0.85 (3H, d, H-27), 0.98 (3H, d, J=7.0 Hz, H-21), and two methyl groups grafted with quaternary carbons at δ H 0.55 (3H, s, C-18), 0.80 (3H, s, H-19). The 13 C-NMR spectrum showed compound 6 has 29 carbon signals. In the low-field magnetic resonance, there were two signals of olefin carbons at δ C 139.69 (C-8), δ C 117.42 (C-7). Methyl carbon appeared at δ C 71.09 (C-3). Two signals at δ C 33.92, 43.41 characterized quaternary carbons C-10 and C-13. Seven methine carbons appeared at δ C 40.28 (C-5), 49.48 (C-9), 55.06 (C14), 56.12 (C-17), 36.59 (C-20), 45.88 (C-24), 29.21 (C-25). Eleven methylene carbons were at δ C 37.16 (C-1), 31.48 (C-2), 37.99 (C-4), 29.66 (C-6), 22.97 (C11), 39.59 (C-12), 23.10 (C-15), 27.95 (C-16), 34.22 (C-22), 26.25 (C-23), 19.81 (C-28). Six methyl carbons appeared at δ C 11.84 (C-18), 13.03 (C-19), 21.56 (C-21), 18.91 (C-26), 19.05 (C-27), 11.97 (C-29). By analyzing the 1 H-NMR and 13 C-NMR spectral data and comparing the spectral data of compound 6 with reference 10 , the structure of compound 6 was given as schottenol. Compound 7 (Figure 2) was obtained as white crystals, completely soluble in chloroform. HR-ESIMS of compound 7 exhibited an ion peak at m/z 423.4234 [M-H]− , consistent with a molecular formula of C28 H56 O2 . The 1 H-NMR spectrum showed a signal of two methylene protons grafted with a carbonyl group at δ H 2.35 (2H, t, J=7.5 Hz, H-2), a signal of two methylene protons defined H-3 at δ H 1.63 (2H, quint, H-3). Furthermore, at δ H 1.25 (2nH, s) there was a signal of accumulable protons of methylene groups in the saturated carbon chain. A signal at δ H 0.88 (3H, t, J =6.9 Hz) characterized methyl protons. The 13 C-NMR and DEPT-NMR spectrum showed a carbonyl carbon signal at δ C 178.85, a carbon grafted with a carbonyl group δ C 33.84, a methylene carbon separated carbonyl group by a carbon 395 Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(4):391-399 at δ C 31.92, a methyl carbon at δ C 14.10, a methylene carbon grafted with methyl carbon at δ C 22.68, a methylene carbon separated methyl group by a carbon at δ C 24.70. Moreover, the other carbon signals at δ C 29.06-29.69 described methylene groups in the saturated carbon chain. By analyzing the 1 H-NMR, 13 C-NMR, DEPT, MS spectral data, the structure of compound 7 was supposed to be montanic acid. The inhibition of the α -glucosidase test was performed in optimal conditions for the enzyme that has been optimized. The data of the spectrophotometer (OD) was recorded and the inhibition (%) was expressed by the average of triplicated experiments and standard deviation (Table 2). The IC50 values were determined based on the logarithmic equations (Figure 3) drawn from the data in Table 2. The result showed that acarbose had the highest IC50 value of 0.722 µ g.mL−1 . IC50 value of methanol, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, petroleum ether extracts were 0.244, 0.099, 0.209, 0.064 µ g.mL−1 , respectively. The IC50 values of the four extracts were lower than those of acarbose. This indicates the extracts of G. procumbens could perform well in inhibiting α -glucosidase and petroleum ether extract showed the most potent effect. DISCUSSION Previous studies have shown that G. procumbens contains many compounds such as steroids, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, terpenoids, etc 2 . Among the seven compounds isolated, five compounds were known in G. procumbens syringic acid (1) (hydroxybenzoic acid structure), quercetin (2) (flavonoid glycoside structure), β -sitosterol 3-O-β -D-glucopyranoside (5), schottenol (6) (steroid structure), montanic acid (7) (acid carboxylic), the two compounds N,Ndimethylanthranilic acid (3) and dehydrovomifoliol (4) were isolated in G. procumbens for the first time. Previous studies have been conducted to investigate the anti-diabetic activities of G. procumbens leaves aqueous and ethanolic extracts and its possible underlying antihyperglycemic mechanisms of action involving liver carbohydrate metabolism in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats 3 . There was no previous study has ever conducted on anti-diabetes by inhibiting the enzyme α -glucosidase. From the results of the test on inhibiting α -glucosidase enzyme, which we have been doing in this study and the streptozotocin-induced diabetes treatment reported in previous studies, we can strongly believe that G. 396 proumbens would be useful in the treatment of diabetes. CONCLUSION In the investigation of the chemical constituents of G. procumbens collected at Gia Lai province, seven compounds were isolated syringic acid (1), quercetin (2), N,N-dimethylanthranilic acid (3), dehydrovomifoliol (4), β -sitosterol 3-O-β -D-glucopyranoside (5), schottenol (6), montanic acid (7). All four extracts (methanol, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, petroleum ether) showed inhibiting activity on α glucosidase. The IC50 values of these four extracts were all smaller than those of the positive control acarbose. Petroleum ether extract gave the best ability to inhibit α -glucosidase with the lowest value of IC50 0.064 µ g.mL−1 . The results of this study showed that G. procumbens has great potential in treating diabetes. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS IC50 : 50% Inhibitory Concentration TLC: Thin-Layer Chromatography NMR: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 1 H-NMR: Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 13 C-NMR: Carbon Nuclear Magnetic Resonance DEPT: Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer HR-ESI-MS: High-Resolution ElectroSpray Ionization Mass Spectrum MeOH: Methanol PE: Petroleum Ether EA: Ethyl Acetate n-Bu: n-Butanol OD: Optical Density AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS The contributions of all authors are equal in selecting data, calculating descriptors, analyzing results, and writing a manuscript. COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare that they have no competing interests. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We are grateful to Dr. Dang Van Son, Department of Biological Resources, Institute of Tropical Biology– Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, for the determination of the scientific name for the plant. Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(4):391-399 Table 1: The 1 H-NMR and 13 C-NMR data of compounds (1 – 4) No. 1 H-NMR 13 C-NMR 1a 2b 3a 4c 1a 1 _ _ _ _ 121.5 2 7.33 (2H, s) _ _ 2.29 (2H, d, 17.0) 2.58 (2H, d, 17.0) 108.2 3 _ _ 7.72 (1H, dd, 8.0, 0.8) _ 4 _ _ 7.41 (1H, td, 7.9, 1.2) 5 _ _ 6 7.33 (2H, s) 7 3a 4c 126.3 42.6 146.8 153.4 50.6 148.4 135.5 123.5 200.3 5.98 (1H, s) 141.6 175.7 134.8 128.0 7.66 (1H, td, 7.3, 1.6) _ 148.4 160.6 128.1 164.6 6.16 (1H, d, 1.5) 8.12 (1H, dd, 7.5, 1.5) _ 108.2 98.2 132.2 80.0 _ _ - 7.04 (1H, d, 16.0) 167.5 163.7 167.1 148.3 8 3.88 (3H, s) 6.39 (1H, d, 1.5) 2.85 (3H, s) 6.49 (1H, d, 16.0) 56.7 93.3 45.7 131.7 9 3.88 (3H, s) _ 2.85 (3H, s) _ 56.7 156.0 45.7 203.6 10 _ 2.35 (3H, s) 2b 102.9 27.6 11 1.12 (3H, s) 23.5 12 1.07 (3H, s) 24.7 13 1.95 (3H, s) 19.1 1’ _ 121.9 2’ 7.64 (1H, d, 2.0) 114.9 3’ _ 144.9 4’ _ 147.7 5’ 6.86 (1H, d, 8.5) 115.6 6’ 7.86 (1H, dd, 8.5, 2.5) 119.9 a: Acetone; b: DMSO; c: MeOH 397 Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(4):391-399 Table 2: The α -glucosidase inhibitory activity and their IC50 values Extract Concentration GP - EA GP - Bu GP - PE Acarbose 398 IC50 (µ g.mL−1 ) (%) (µ g.mL−1 ) GP - Me Average ± SD Triplicated experiment 0.075 -7.910 0.167 -4.330 -4.024 ± 3.304 0.15 33.555 25.583 24.480 27.873 ± 4.043 0.3 58.285 59.583 59.450 59.106 ± 0.583 0.45 82.515 81.917 66.861 77.097 ± 7.242 0.6 94.005 91.750 90.258 92.004 ± 1.540 0.75 101.499 102.583 102.914 102.332 ±0.605 0.0375 -16.403 -7.417 -1.249 -8.356 ± 6.222 0.075 36.053 33.167 26.395 31.872 ± 4.048 0.1125 54.788 57.417 62.115 58.106 ± 3.031 0.15 81.932 77.750 69.359 76.347 ± 5.228 0.1875 88.260 89.250 89.509 89.006 ± 0.538 0.075 -10.241 0.167 6.495 -2.193 ± 6.847 0.15 32.057 25.583 36.053 34.870 ± 1.998 0.3 75.937 59.583 63.281 69.684 ± 5.168 0.45 89.259 81.917 88.593 87.673 ± 1.793 0.6 100.416 91.750 100.416 100.583 ±0.236 0.0375 14.821 25.167 25.396 21.794 ± 4.932 0.075 59.867 58.167 67.027 61.687 ± 3.840 0.1125 74.022 82.250 72.773 76.348 ± 4.204 0.15 90.924 90.833 91.757 91.171 ± 0.416 0.1875 104.829 103.083 104.330 104.081 ±0.734 0.038 -0.999 -4.500 11.657 2.053 ± 6.940 0.188 34.305 32.333 24.480 30.373 ± 4.244 0.375 43.797 40.750 33.306 39.284 ± 4.407 0.563 49.958 41.250 38.385 43.198 ± 4.922 0.750 57.369 53.167 40.550 50.362 ± 7.147 1.125 56.536 56.750 52.040 55.109 ± 2.172 1.500 65.862 65.583 63.863 65.103 ± 0.884 0.244 0.099 0.209 0.064 0.722 Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(4):391-399 Figure 3: The graphs illustrating the inhibition of α -glucosidase of GP –Me, GP – EA, GP- Bu, GP – PE and acarbose. REFERENCES 1. Yusoff MM, Misran A, Ahmed OA, Majid WH, Puteri EM, Ahmad NF. Gynura procumbens: Agronomic Practices and Future Prospects in Malaysia, Pertanika. J Trop Agric. 2019;42(2):421– 34. 2. Mou KM, Dash PR. A comprehensive review on Gynura procumbens leaves. Inter J Pharm. 2016;1. 3. Tan HL, Chan KG, Pusparajah P, Lee LH, Goh BH. Gynura procumbens: An Overview of the Biological Activities. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:52. PMID: 27014066. Available from: 10. 3389/fphar.2016.00052. 4. Hua QD, Li M, Zhu F, Fu LL, Jian BH. Inhibitory potential of trilobatin from Lithocarpus polystachyus Rehd against α -glucosidase and α -amylase linked to type 2 diabetes. Food Chem. 2012;130(2):261–6. Available from: 10.1016/j. foodchem.2011.07.030. 5. Viet DQ, Sung TV, PG. Some research results about chemical constituents of Gynura sarmentosa DC. Vietnam J Chem. 2005;43(5):577–80. 6. Aly F. Inas M. Abd EI-Wahab Khamis, Samar Yehia, Flavonoids of Neotorularia aculeolata Plant. J Pharm Nutr Sci. 2011;1:134– 9. 7. Lee S, Park JY, Lee D, Seok S, Kwon YJ, Jang TS, et al. Chemical constituents from the rare mushroom Calvatia nipponica inhibit the promotion of angiogenesis in HUVECs. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2017;27(17):4122–7. PMID: 28765012. Available from: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.07.036. 8. Hai NX, Mai NTT. Chemical constituents from Euphorbia thymifolia. Vietnam J Anal Sci. 2015;20(3). 9. Mizushina Y, Nakanishi R, Kuriyama I, Kamiya K, Satake T, Shimazaki N, et al. β -sitosterol-3-O-β -D-glucopyranoside: a eukaryotic DNA polymerase λ inhibitor. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;99(2-3):100–7. PMID: 16621516. Available from: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.12.007. 10. Badreddine A, Karym M, Zarrouk A, Nury T, Kharrassi YE, Nasser B, et al. An expeditious synthesis of spinasterol and schottenol, two phytosterols present in argan oil and in cactus pear seed oil, and evaluation of their biological activities on cells of the central nervous system. Steroids. 2015;99:119– 24. PMID: 25595450. Available from: 10.1016/j.steroids.2015. 01.005. 399