Nội dung

Enzymes for the NADPH-dependent reduction of dihydroxyacetone and D-glyceraldehyde and L-glyceraldehyde in the mould Hypocrea jecorina Janis Liepins1,2, Satu Kuorelahti1, Merja Penttilä1 and Peter Richard1 1 VTT Biotechnology, Espoo, Finland 2 University of Latvia, Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Riga, Latvia Keywords dihydroxyacetone; glycerol dehydrogenase; Hypocrea jecorina; L-glyceraldehyde; NADPspecific glycerol dehydrogenase Correspondence P. Richard, VTT, Tietotie 2, Espoo, PO Box 1000, 02044 VTT, Finland Fax: +358 20 722 7071 Tel: +358 20 722 7190 E-mail: Peter.Richard@vtt.fi (Received 4 May 2006, revised 7 July 2006, accepted 17 July 2006) doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05423.x The mould Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) has two genes coding for enzymes with high similarity to the NADP-dependent glycerol dehydrogenase. These genes, called gld1 and gld2, were cloned and expressed in a heterologous host. The encoded proteins were purified and their kinetic properties characterized. GLD1 catalyses the conversion of d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde to glycerol, whereas GLD2 catalyses the conversion of dihydroxyacetone to glycerol. Both enzymes are specific for NADPH as a cofactor. The properties of GLD2 are similar to those of the previously described NADP-dependent glycerol-2-dehydrogenases (EC 1.1.1.156) purified from different mould species. It is a reversible enzyme active with dihydroxyacetone or glycerol as substrates. GLD1 resembles EC 1.1.1.72. It is also specific for NADPH as a cofactor but has otherwise completely different properties. GLD1 reduces d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde with similar affinities for the two substrates and similar maximal rates. The activity in the oxidizing reaction with glycerol as substrate was under our detection limit. Although the role of GLD2 is to facilitate glycerol formation under osmotic stress conditions, we hypothesize that GLD1 is active in pathways for sugar acid catabolism such as d-galacturonate catabolism. Dihydroxyacetone (DHA), d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde can be reduced using NADPH as a cofactor to form glycerol and NADP. Enzymes catalysing this reaction are generally called NADP:glycerol dehydrogenases. NADP:glycerol dehydrogenase activity is common in moulds and filamentous fungi. Enzymes from different species of filamentous fungi have been purified and characterized. The enzymes purified from Aspergillus niger [1] and Aspergillus nidulans [2] catalyse the reversible reaction from glycerol and NADP to DHA and NADPH. For the A. niger enzyme, an equilibrium constant of 3.1–4.6 · 10)12 m was estimated for the reaction: Glycerol þ NADP Ð DHA þ NADPH þ Hþ A glycerol dehydrogenase with slightly different properties was described in Neurospora crassa, where d-glyceraldehyde was the preferred substrate over DHA in the reductive reaction. This enzyme was also reversible, i.e. it showed activity with glycerol and NADP [3]. The purified glycerol dehydrogenases from A. nidulans and A. niger also showed low activity with d-glyceraldehyde; however, DHA was the preferred substrate [2]. The A. niger enzyme was commercially available as a partly purified preparation, and partial amino acid sequences were available [4]. Abbreviations DHA, dihydroxyacetone; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate. FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 4229–4235 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS 4229 NADP-glycerol dehydrogenases in mould J. Liepins et al. Glycerol dehydrogenases have different functions in filamentous fungi. One role is to form part of the biosynthetic pathway for glycerol production. In this pathway, dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) is dephosphorylated to DHA and then reduced to glycerol by an NADP-dependent glycerol dehydrogenase [5]. This is different from the situation in yeast. Yeast lacks the enzyme activity to dephosphorylate DHAP [6]. Instead, DHAP is first reduced to glycerol 3-phosphate, which is then dephosphorylated to form glycerol. Glycerol dehydrogenase activities, however, have been reported in different yeast species [6]. In filamentous fungi, the NADP-dependent glycerol dehydrogenase was also suggested to be functional in the catabolism of DHA [2]. Another function of a glycerol dehydrogenase is to reduce glyceraldehyde. d-Glyceraldehyde is generated in the nonphosphorylated pathway for d-gluconate [7] or d-galactonate catabolism [8]. l-Glyceraldehyde was suggested to be generated in the catabolic pathway for d-galacturonate (Kuorelahti et al., unpublished results). In these pathways, the sugar acids d-gluconate, d-galactonate and l-galactonate (in the d-galacturonate pathway) are converted by a dehydratase to the corresponding 2-keto-3-deoxy sugar acid, which is then split by an aldolase to form pyruvate and d-glyceraldehyde or pyruvate and l-glyceraldehyde. A glycerol dehydrogenase is probably not part of the path for glycerol catabolism. A glycerol dehydrogenase mutant of A. nidulans was not affected in growth on glycerol [9]. Glycerol is catabolized in filamentous fungi through glycerol kinase and a mitochondrial glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, as in yeast [10]. Aspergillus nidulans probably has more than one glycerol dehydrogenase; one constitutive and one inducible on d-galacturonate [11]. A gene for a glycerol dehydrogenase, gldB, was identified in A. nidulans. This gene was shown to be effective for osmotolerance; a gldB disruptant did not produce glycerol, and the mutant had lost osmotolerance and showed no glycerol dehydrogenase activity [9]. A homologue of gldB, gld1, was identified in Trichoderma atroviride. Here, the glycerol dehydrogenase activity of the mycelial extract correlated with the transcription level of gld1 [12]. In this study, we identified two open reading frames with high homology to previously described glycerol dehydrogenases in the genome of the filamentous fungus Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei). These open reading frames were expressed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the enzymes were purified and characterized. We show that one enzyme catalyses the reduction of d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde to 4230 glycerol, whereas the other reduces DHA. This is the first report on heterologous expression combined with kinetic characterizations of NADP-dependent glycerol dehydrogenases from mould. Results Partial amino acid sequences of an NADP-dependent glycerol dehydrogenase from A. niger had been described previously [4]. We used these sequences to find homologies in the translated H. jecorina genome sequence. We identified two potential genes in the genome sequence that had, after translation, homologies to the partial amino acid sequences of the A. niger enzyme. Comparing the nucleotide sequence with sequences of other dehydrogenases enabled us to predict the start and the stop codons and to design primers to amplify the open reading frames using PCR. For the first potential glycerol dehydrogenase gene, we predicted introns in the genomic DNA. For that reason, we amplified the open reading frame from cDNA. For the second of the two potential glycerol dehydrogenases, we predicted no introns and therefore amplified the open reading frame from the genomic DNA. We called the genes gld1 and gld2, respectively. Comparison of the cDNA of gld1 with the genome sequence revealed that the genomic DNA indeed contained three introns. The intron sequences started after nucleotides 327, 510 and 916 of the open reading frame and contained 70, 69 and 62 nucleotides, respectively. The sequence of the open reading frame codes for a protein with 331 amino acids and a calculated molecular mass of 36 232 Da. The sequence is deposited at GenBank and has the accession number DQ422037. The open reading frame of gld2 coded for a protein with 318 amino acids and a calculated molecular mass of 35 663 Da. The open reading frame for gld2 is deposited at GenBank and has the accession number DQ422038. The gld1 and gld2 genes were expressed in a heterologous host, the yeast S. cerevisiae, under a strong and constitutive promoter. The control strain contained the empty expression vector. The cells were then disintegrated and the crude extract was analysed. S. cerevisiae is a suitable expression system because it does not have endogenous NADP:glycerol dehydrogenase activity. gld1 The expression of gld1 in S. cerevisiae did not result in glycerol dehydrogenase activity; that is, in the assay with glycerol and NADP as substrates, no activity was FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 4229–4235 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS J. Liepins et al. NADP-glycerol dehydrogenases in mould detected. Even at an alkaline pH of 9.5, the activity was below our detection limit, which was about 0.1 nkatÆmg)1. Also, the control strain did not show such activity. However, in the reverse or reductive direction, we observed activity with NADPH and dl-glyceraldehyde. The reductive activity in the crude extract was estimated as 2 nkat per mg of extracted protein. In the control strain carrying the empty plasmid, this activity was below 0.1 nkatÆmg)1. The activity with NADPH and dl-glyceraldehyde in an extract of H. jecorina was about 3 nkatÆmg)1. The GLD1 protein was tagged with a histidine tag at the N-terminal end by adding the coding sequence for six histidines to the end of the open reading frame, and then expressed in S. cerevisiae. The tagged protein had a similar activity in the crude extract as the nontagged protein, indicating that the tag did not affect the protein activity. The tagged protein was then purified and further analysed. The purified GLD1 showed activity with dl-glyceraldehyde and NADPH as a cofactor. It had a very much reduced activity with DHA (Table 1). No activity was observed with NADH as a cofactor. Other aldehydes were tested with NADPH and the results are summarized in Table 1. We found activity with glyoxal (ethane-1,2-dione), methylglyoxal (pyruvaldehyde) and diacetyl (2,3-butanedione), but no activity with C5 or C6 sugars. We tested d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde individually and observed similar activities; the activity with l-glyceraldehyde was only slightly lower. For d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde, we also observed similar Michaelis–Menten constants of about 0.9 mm (Table 1); the Michaelis– Menten constant for NADPH was about 40 lm. As with the crude extract, we did not observe oxidative activity with glycerol and NADP. Also, with other C4 and C5 polyols no activity with NADP as a cofactor was observed. We tested erythritol, ribitol, xylitol and dl-arabinitol at a concentration of 50 mm. gld2 The expression of gld2 in S. cerevisiae resulted in glycerol dehydrogenase activity. In the assay with glycerol and NADP as substrates, we found an activity of 0.5 nkatÆmg)1 in the crude extract. Activity was also observed in the reverse direction. With DHA and NADPH, the activity was 15 nkatÆmg)1. GLD2 was tagged with a histidine tag at the N-terminus, in the same way as GLD1, to facilitate enzyme purification. The tagged protein had a similar activity in crude yeast extract as the untagged protein, indicating that the tag was not interfering with the protein activity. The tagged protein was purified and then used for further analysis. In the reductive reaction, the Michaelis–Menten constant Km for DHA was 1 mm, and the Km for NADPH was 50 lm. The Vmax was estimated at 2400 nkat per mg of purified protein. In the oxidative reaction, the Km for glycerol was 350 mm and the Km for NADP was 110 lm. The Vmax was about 1200 nkatÆ mg)1. In the reductive reaction, very low activity was observed with d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde (Table 1). Lower activities were also observed with methylglyoxal and diacetyl. In the oxidative reaction, the enzyme was active with glycerol and to a lower Table 1. The specificities and kinetic properties of the histidine-tagged and purified GLD1 and GLD2. The reductive assay conditions were 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) and 0.4 mM NADPH. The oxidative assay conditions were 200 mM Tris ⁄ HCl (pH 9.5) and 1 mM NADP. The activities are given in nkat per mg of protein and in kcat (in parentheses). The enzyme efficacy, Vmax ⁄ Km, is given in s)1ÆM)1. ND, no activity detected. Vmax (nkatÆmg)1Æs)1) Dihydroxyacetone L-Glyceraldehyde D-Glyceraldehyde Diacetyl Glyoxal Methylglyoxal Acetoin D-Ribose D-Xylose D-Glucose Glycerol GLD1 GLD2 30 140 150 330 375 410 300 160 450 190 ND 2400 500 210 2500 260 3300 480 ND ND ND 1200 (1.4) (5.0) (5.5) (12) (14) (15) (11) (5.8) (16) (6.8) Vmax ⁄ Km (s)1ÆM)1) Km (mM) (86) (18) (7.5) (88) (9.2) (120) (21) (56) GLD1 GLD2 GLD1 GLD2 5.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 2.4 0.4 122 122 334 470 ND 1 8 96 13 30 37 500 113 ND ND ND 350 240 5500 6100 13 5800 3600 90 48 48 14 0.086 2250 78 6800 310 FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 4229–4235 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS 185 160 4231 NADP-glycerol dehydrogenases in mould J. Liepins et al. extent with erythritol. Low activities were also observed with C5 and C6 sugar alcohols (Table 1). The enzyme was, like GLD1, specific for the cofactor couple NADP ⁄ NAPDH. Discussion There have been several reports about NADP-dependent glycerol dehydrogenases in mould. The previously purified enzymes showed activity with glycerol and NADP in the oxidizing direction and activities with DHA or d-glyceraldehyde and NADPH in the reducing direction. According to the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB), there are two kinds of NADP-dependent glycerol dehydrogenase. One is an enzyme with the systematic name glycerol:NADP+ oxidoreductase (EC 1.1.1.72) that facilitates the reaction of glycerol and NADP to form d-glyceraldehyde and NADPH; the other is a glycerol:NADP+ 2-oxidoreductase (EC 1.1.1.156) that facilitates the reaction of glycerol and NADP to form DHA and NADPH. The enzymes purified from A. niger and A. nidulans fall into the category EC 1.1.1.156, because they are mainly active with DHA, as shown by 90% smaller activity with d-glyceraldehyde and no activity with l-glyceraldehyde [2]. The glycerol dehydrogenase purified from N. crassa [3] is in the category EC 1.1.1.72, because this enzyme has the highest activity with d-glyceraldehyde. There are also indications that mould can contain more than one NADP:glycerol dehydrogenase. In A. nidulans, it was shown that upon induction by d-galacturonic acid, a second NADP:glycerol dehydrogenase was induced [11]. Also in A. niger, the production of a d-glyceraldehyde-specific enzyme was induced by d-galacturonic acid [13]. All these observations harmonize with our finding that the H. jecorina genome has two genes coding for enzymes that are similar to NADP:glycerol dehydrogenases. Accordingly, we cloned these two open reading frames, expressed them in S. cerevisiae and confirmed that active enzymes were expressed. The histidine-tagged proteins were then purified and used for kinetic analysis (Fig. 1). The gld2 gene had the highest homology to gldB of A. nidulans and gld1 of T. atroviride [12]. GLD2 had the highest activity with DHA and only low activity with d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde. It is consequently a glycerol:NADP+ 2-oxidoreductase with the number EC 1.1.1.156. The properties of GLD2 are similar to those of the enzymes purified from A. niger [1] and A. nidulans [2]; that is, the enzyme catalyses the reversible reduction of DHA to glycerol using 4232 Fig. 1. SDS ⁄ PAGE of the histidine-tagged and purified GLD1 and GLD2 proteins. GLD1 is in lane B and GLD2 in lane C. Lane A contains the molecular mass markers with masses 107, 81, 48.7, 33.8, 27 and 20.7 kDa (from top to bottom). NADPH as a cofactor and has only low activity with d-glyceraldehyde or l-glyceraldehyde. The function of gld2 is probably in glycerol synthesis, similar to gldB in A. nidulans. The gld1 gene showed highest homology to an aldoketoreductase from Penicillium citrinum [14] in a blast search, not considering hypothetical proteins. The kinetic properties of GLD1 were also distinctly different from those of GLD2. GLD1 had the highest activity with d-glyceraldehyde and only low activity with DHA. Thus the enzyme should be called glycerol:NADP+ oxidoreductase, with the number EC 1.1.1.72. The kinetic properties of GLD1 showed some similarity to those of the glycerol dehydrogenase purified from N. crassa [3]. The N. crassa enzyme also had the highest activity with d-glyceraldehyde and lower activity with DHA. However, GLD1 had several properties that were different from those of the N. crassa enzyme. GLD1 had a lower activity with DHA and higher activity with l-glyceraldehyde. Another significant difference is that the N. crassa enzyme is reversible, i.e. shows activity with glycerol FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 4229–4235 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS J. Liepins et al. and NADP; however, it is not clear whether glyceraldehyde or DHA is formed. With GLD1, the activity with glycerol and NADP was below our detection limits. A possible interpretation of this difference in the reversibility of the two enzymes is that the N. crassa enzyme is converting glycerol to DHA, whereas GLD1 is converting glycerol to glyceraldehyde. The formation of glyceraldehyde is energetically less favourable than the formation of DHA, and is not observed for this reason. Another possible explanation is that the oxidation of glycerol by GLD1 is allosterically inhibited. We have made a clustalw alignment of GLD1 and GLD2 of H. jecorina together with some homologous proteins for which the protein sequences have been published and some of the kinetic properties have been described. GLD1 showed highest homology to the P. citrinum KER [14], the S. cerevisiae YPR1 [15] and the S. cerevisiae GCY1 [16]. From their kinetic properties, all these proteins can be categorized as EC 1.1.1.72. Another group of proteins that showed a high degree of homology were the H. jecorina GLD2, the A. nidulans GLDB [9] and the T. atroviride GLD1 [12]. These three proteins can be categorized as EC 1.1.1.156 according to their kinetic properties. The high degree of homology within these two groups of proteins might be used to predict the enzyme class of yet uncharacterized proteins. Because GLD1 had the highest activity with d-glyceraldehyde and similar activity with l-glyceraldehyde, we would assume that the role of this enzyme is to convert d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde to glycerol. d-Glyceraldehyde is an intermediate in the catabolic path for d-gluconate [7] and d-galactonate [8]. l-Glyceraldehyde is an intermediate in the catabolic path for d-galacturonate [17,18]. A glycerol dehydrogenase has been described previously to be induced by d-galacturonate in the mould A. nidulans [11]. It would be reasonable to assume that this induced enzyme also has a role in d-galacturonate catabolism. This additional glycerol dehydrogenase in A. nidulans was observed when the mycelial extract was separated by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and enzyme activities with NADP and glycerol as substrates were visualized by Zymogram staining; that is, only enzymes that had activity with glycerol and NADP were visualized. As GLD1 is not active with glycerol and NADP, it must be different from the enzyme induced by d-galacturonate. As GLD1 or any enzyme reducing l-glyceraldehyde has a clear function in d-galacturonate catabolism, we tested whether such an enzyme activity is induced. For that purpose, we grew mycelia on different carbon NADP-glycerol dehydrogenases in mould sources including d-galacturonate, and tested the crude mycelial extracts for activity with l-glyceraldehyde or d-glyceraldehyde and NADPH. We observed similar activities on all carbon sources, suggesting that GLD1 is not induced by d-galacturonic acid (data not shown). NADP-dependent glycerol dehydrogenase activity has also been reported in yeast. From the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, a glycerol:NADP 2-oxidoreductase was purified. This enzyme was reversible and had a 100-fold higher activity with DHA than with dl-glyceraldehyde. The active enzyme complex consisted of two different subunits with masses of 25 and 30 kDa [19]. The corresponding genes have not been identified. In this context, it is interesting to note that S. pombe also has an NAD-dependent glycerol dehydrogenase, a glycerol:NAD 2-oxidoreductase [20], an enzyme that has not been reported in mould. In S. cerevisiae, NADP:glycerol dehydrogenase activies have not been described to the best of our knowledge. However, it was suggested that the GCY1 of S. cerevisiae codes for such an enzyme, because the amino acid sequence had homologies to the purified enzyme from A. niger [4]. The Ypr1p of S. cerevisiae had a high degree of homology to Gcy1p but less to the purified enzyme from A. niger. YPR1 was expressed in E. coli and the enzyme catalytic properties were studied. The enzyme used NADPH to reduce dl-glyceraldehyde and had about 100-fold lower activity with DHA. Ypr1p also showed activity in the oxidative direction with glycerol and NADP. However, this activity was about 4000 times lower than in the reducing direction with dl-glyceraldehyde and NADPH [15]. In this article we have shown that the same mould species can contain two distinctly different glycerol dehydrogenases, one for DHA (EC 1.1.1.156) and one for d-glyceraldehyde and l-glyceraldehyde (EC 1.1.1.72). This seems to be a common feature in different moulds, as other mould species such as N. crassa and A. nidulans contain genes with high homology to both gld1 and gld2. Although the two genes have a high degree of homology, the differences in sequence are sufficient to predict the specificity. Experimental procedures Cloning and expression of the open reading frames for gld1 and gld2 The gld1 gene was cloned from a cDNA library of the H. jecorina strain Rut C-30 [21] by PCR. The following primers, introducing an EcoRI restriction site, were used: 5¢-gaattcaacatgtcttccggaaggac-3¢ and 5¢-gaattcttacagcttgatga cagcag-3¢. The PCR product was cloned in a TOPO vector FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 4229–4235 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS 4233 NADP-glycerol dehydrogenases in mould J. Liepins et al. (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and an EcoRI fragment of about 1 kb isolated. This fragment was then ligated to the EcoRI site of the p2159 vector, a vector with TPI1 promoter and URA3 selection marker derived from the pYX212 [17], and the orientation of the open reading frame in the expression vector was checked. The S. cerevisiae strain CEN.PK2-1B was then transformed with the expression vector and grown on selective medium. As a control, the same strain was transformed with the empty vector p2159. The gld2 gene was cloned by PCR using genomic DNA derived from the H. jecorina strain QM6a as a template. The following primers were used: 5¢-gaattcagaatg gcctccaagacgta-3¢ and 5¢-gaattcttattcctcctctggccaaa-3¢. The PCR product was cloned, similar to gld1, first in a TOPO vector and then in the expression vector p2159. The S. cerevisiae strain CEN.PK2-1B was then transformed with the expression vector. The gld1 and gld2 genes were also expressed with N-terminal or C-terminal histidine tags. For that purpose, a coding sequence for six histidines was introduced by PCR either at the N-terminus, after the ATG, or at the C-terminus before the stop codon. The expression of these histidine-tagged proteins was done as described above. Strains, growth conditions and cell extracts The E. coli strain DH5a was used in the cloning procedures. It was grown in LB medium with ampicillin at 37 C. The S. cerevisiae strain CEN.PK2-1D (VW-1B) was the host for the heterologous expression. It was grown in synthetic medium lacking uracil when required for selection at 30 C. The H. jecorina (T. reesei) strain was Rut C-30 or QM6a. Hypocrea jecorina was grown in liquid medium containing 2 gÆL)1 proteose peptone, 15 gÆL)1 KH2PO4, 5 gÆL)1 (NH4)2SO4, 0.6 gÆL)1 MgSO4.7H2O, 0.6 gÆL)1 CaCl2.2H2O, trace elements [22], and 20 gÆL)1 of the main carbon source, as specified, at 28 C. To make mycelial or cell extracts of H. jecorina or S. cerevisiae, about 100 lg of fresh mycelia or cells were mixed with 300 lL of glass beads (diameter 0.4 mm) and 400 lL of buffer [5 mm sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, and complete, EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Roche, Basel, Switzerland)] and disintegrated in a MiniBead Beater (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK, USA) three times for 30 s. The mixture was then centrifuged in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge at full speed for 25 min, and the supernatant used for the analysis. The protein content of the extract was estimated using the Bio-Rad protein assay, and c-globulin was used as a standard. Enzyme purification and assays To purify the histidine-tagged proteins, the S. cerevisiae cells expressing the tagged constructs were grown and a cell extract was obtained as described before. The 4234 histidine-tagged protein was purified with a nickel ⁄ nitrilotriacetic acid column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The glycerol dehydrogenase activity was measured in a buffer containing 200 mm Tris ⁄ HCl (pH 9.5), 1 mm NADP and purified enzyme. The reaction was started by adding glycerol. When analysing cell extracts, we used a final glycerol concentration of 10 mm and a pH of 8.0. The reductase activity was measured in a buffer containing 10 mm sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) and 400 lm NADPH, which was supplemented with the cell extract or the purified enzyme. The reaction was started by adding DHA, d-glyceraldehyde, l-glyceraldehyde or any of the other substrates, and the reaction followed spectrophotometrically by monitoring the NADPH at 340 nm. When the Michaelis–Menten constants were measured, all substrates were first mixed and the reaction was then started by adding the purified enzyme. All assays were performed at 30 C in a Cobas Mira automated analyser (Roche). l-Glyceraldehyde was synthesized from l-gulono-1,4-lactone as described previously [23,24]. Acknowledgements JL was supported by travel grant from CIMO, a FEBS short-term fellowship and the European Social Foundation. SK was supported by the Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation and PR was an Academy Research Fellow of the Academy of Finland. References 1 Baliga BS, Bhatnagar GM & Jagannathan V (1964) Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-specific glycerol dehydrogenase of Aspergillus niger. Ind J Biochem 1, 86–92. 2 Schuurink R, Busink R, Hondmann DH, Witteveen CF & Visser J (1990) Purification and properties of NADP+-dependent glycerol dehydrogenases from Aspergillus nidulans and A. niger. J Gen Microbiol 136, 1043–1050. 3 Viswanath-Reddy M, Pyle JE & Howe HB (1978) Purification and properties of NADP-linked glycerol dehydrogenase from Neurospora crassa. J Gen Microbiol 107, 289–296. 4 Norbeck J & Blomberg A (1997) Metabolic and regulatory changes associated with growth of S. cerevisiae in 1.4 M NaCl. Evidence for osmotic induction of glycerol dissimilation via the dihydroxyacetone pathway. J Biol Chem 272, 5544–5554. 5 Fillinger S, Ruijter G, Tamas MJ, Visser J, Thevelein JM & d’Enfert C (2001) Molecular and physiological characterization of the NAD-dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Microbiol 39, 145–157. FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 4229–4235 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS J. Liepins et al. 6 Prior BA & Hohmann S (1997) Glycerol production and osmoregulation. In Yeast Sugar Metabolism (Zimmermann FK & Entian K-D, eds), pp. 313–337. Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, PA, USA. 7 Elzainy TA, Hassan MM & Allam AM (1973) New pathway for nonphosphorylated degradation of gluconate by Aspergillus niger. J Bacteriol 114, 457–459. 8 Elshafei AM & Abdel-Fatah OM (2001) Evidence for a non-phosphorylated route of galactose breakdown in cell-free extracts of Aspergillus niger. Enzyme Microb Technol 29, 76–83. 9 de Vries RP, Flitter SJ, van de Vondervoort PJ, Chaveroche MK, Fontaine T, Fillinger S, Ruijter GJ, d’Enfert C & Visser J (2003) Glycerol dehydrogenase, encoded by gldB is essential for osmotolerance in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Microbiol 49, 131–141. 10 Hondmann DH, Busink R, Witteveen CF & Visser J (1991) Glycerol catabolism in Aspergillus nidulans. J Gen Microbiol 137, 629–636. 11 Sealy-Lewis HM & Fairhurst V (1992) An NADP+dependent glycerol dehydrogenase in Aspergillus nidulans is inducible by d-galacturonate. Curr Genet 22, 293–296. 12 Seidl V, Seiboth B, Karaffa L & Kubicek CP (2004) The fungal STRE-element-binding protein Seb1 is involved but not essential for glycerol dehydrogenase (gld1) gene expression and glycerol accumulation in Trichoderma atroviride during osmotic stress. Fungal Genet Biol 41, 1132–1140. 13 Witteveen CF, van de Vondervoort P, Dijkema C, Swart K & Visser J (1990) Characterization of a glycerol kinase mutant of Aspergillus niger. J Gen Microbiol 136, 1299–1305. 14 Asako H, Wakita R, Matsumura K, Shimizu M, Sakai J & Itoh N (2005) Purification and cDNA cloning of NADPH-dependent aldoketoreductase, involved in asymmetric reduction of methyl 4-bromo-3-oxobutyrate, from Penicillium citrinum IFO4631. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 1101–1104. NADP-glycerol dehydrogenases in mould 15 Ford G & Ellis EM (2002) Characterization of Ypr1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a 2-methylbutyraldehyde reductase. Yeast 19, 1087–1096. 16 Träff KL, Jönsson LJ & Hahn-Hägerdal B (2002) Putative xylose and arabinose reductases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 19, 1233–1241. 17 Kuorelahti S, Kalkkinen N, Penttilä M, Londesborough J & Richard P (2005) Identification in the mold Hypocrea jecorina of the first fungal d-galacturonic acid reductase. Biochemistry 44, 11234–11240. 18 Kuorelahti S, Jouhten P, Maaheimo H, Penttilä M & Richard P (2006) l-Galactonate dehydratase is part of the fungal path for d-galacturonic acid catabolism. Mol Microbiol 61, 1060–1068. 19 Marshall JH, Kong YC, Sloan J & May JW (1989) Purification and properties of glycerol:NADP+ 2-oxidoreductase from Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Gen Microbiol 135, 697–701. 20 Marshall JH, May J & Sloan J (1985) Purification and properties of glycerol:NAD+ 2-oxidoreductase (glycerol dehydrogenase) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Gen Microbiol 131, 1581–1588. 21 Margolles-Clark E, Tenkanen M, Nakari-Setälä T & Penttilä M (1996) Cloning of genes encoding alpha-larabinofuranosidase and beta-xylosidase from Trichoderma reesei by expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 62, 3840–3846. 22 Mandels M & Weber J (1969) The production of cellulases. In Cellulases and Their Applications (Hajny GJ & Reese ET, eds), pp. 391–414. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. 23 Hubschwerlen C (1986) A convenient synthesis of L-(S)glyceraldehyde acetonide from l-ascorbic acid. Synth Commun 11, 962–964. 24 Lamble HJ, Danson MJ, Hough DW & Bull SD (2005) Engineering stereocontrol into an aldolase-catalysed reaction. Chem Commun (Camb), doi: 10.1039/b413255f. FEBS Journal 273 (2006) 4229–4235 ª 2006 The Authors Journal compilation ª 2006 FEBS 4235